Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 210632
Summary: | Review Request: fbg - Falling Block Game | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Hans de Goede <hdegoede> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Michał Bentkowski <mr.ecik> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-10-14 11:47:39 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 163779 |
Description
Hans de Goede
2006-10-13 13:47:05 UTC
MUST items: * rpmlint doesn't show anything * package is named well * spec file name is good * package meets Packaging Guidelines * package is licensed with an GPL open-source compatible license * License field in spec file doesn't match actual license * license file is included in %doc * md5sums are matching (82db64d84b6172f5676fcff69d533881) * package successfully compiles on x86_64 * BuildRequires listed well (mock builds fine) * no locales * proper %post and %postun sections * not relocatable * package owns directories well * no duplicates in %files * every %files section includes %defattr * proper %clean section * macros used well * .desktop file is present THINGS to do: * change spec's License field to GPL Fix thing mentioned above and package will be approved, Woops, good catch. I used a spec from a previous package for this and that stayed in. Here is a version with the license tag fixed: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/fbg.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/fbg-0.9-2.fc6.src.rpm You haven't updated a spec file but a SRPM looks good. So package is APPROVED. Oops, you're right I forgot to upload the spec. Thanks for looking at the SRPM. I've imported and build the correct/updated srpm, closing. Thanks! |