Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 218721

Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Distribution - Perform tests on all modules of a distribution
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Chris Weyl <cweyl>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Jason Tibbitts <j>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: kevin, paul, pertusus
Target Milestone: ---Flags: dennis: fedora-cvs+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Distribution/
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-12-07 02:43:38 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 163779, 218722    

Description Chris Weyl 2006-12-07 00:05:52 UTC
SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Test-Distribution-1.26-1.fc6.src.rpm
SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Test-Distribution.spec

Description:
When using this module in a test script, it goes through all the modules in
your distribution, checks their POD, checks that they compile ok and checks
that they all define a $VERSION.

Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2006-12-07 02:02:08 UTC
* source files match upstream:
   64dc13f51f60f6022bb8e628f1297957  Test-Distribution-1.26.tar.gz
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  License text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   perl(Test::Distribution) = 1.26
   perl(Test::Distribution::base)
   perl(Test::Distribution::description)
   perl(Test::Distribution::exports)
   perl(Test::Distribution::manifest)
   perl(Test::Distribution::pod)
   perl(Test::Distribution::podcover)
   perl(Test::Distribution::prereq)
   perl(Test::Distribution::sig)
   perl(Test::Distribution::use)
   perl(Test::Distribution::versions)
   perl-Test-Distribution = 1.26-1.fc7
  =
   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)
   perl(ExtUtils::Manifest)
   perl(File::Find::Rule) >= 0.03
   perl(Module::CoreList) >= 1.93
   perl(Module::Signature)
   perl(Pod::Coverage) >= 0.17
   perl(Test::More)
   perl(Test::Pod) >= 0.95
   perl(Test::Pod::Coverage)
   perl(strict)
   perl(vars)
   perl(warnings)
* %check is present and all tests pass:
   All tests successful, 6 subtests skipped.
   Files=9, Tests=46,  2 wallclock secs ( 0.89 cusr +  0.24 csys =  1.13 CPU)
   The skipped checks are due to either gpg failures due to missing keys (would
probably require network access) or due to unimplemented tests.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

APPROVED

Comment 2 Chris Weyl 2006-12-07 02:43:38 UTC
Imported and building for devel; branches requested for FC-[56].

Thanks for the review!

Comment 3 Patrice Dumas 2008-02-24 09:26:32 UTC
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: perl-Test-Distribution
New Branches: EL-4 EL-5
Updated EPEL Owners: pertusus cweyl



Comment 4 Patrice Dumas 2008-02-24 09:46:17 UTC
Chris accepted my offer to be EPEL maintainer by mail, maybe he 
should confirm?

Comment 5 Kevin Fenzi 2008-02-25 21:31:21 UTC
Sure, Chris? 

Comment 6 Chris Weyl 2008-02-26 02:30:53 UTC
Sorry for the delay -- with pleasure, confirmed :)

Comment 7 Kevin Fenzi 2008-02-26 03:23:47 UTC
cvs done.

Comment 8 Paul Howarth 2010-05-13 16:07:04 UTC
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: perl-Test-Distribution
New Branches: EL-6
Updated EPEL Owners: pghmcfc cweyl

Comment 9 Dennis Gilmore 2010-05-13 22:45:59 UTC
this was excluded from mass branching of EL-6 why is it being added now ?

Comment 10 Paul Howarth 2010-05-14 06:56:32 UTC
The EPEL-4/5 maintainer (pertusus) isn't maintaining packages in EPEL-6 (and will probably orphan EPEL-4/5 if someone else will pick it up - I will be happy to do that by the way); I didn't realise I needed this package as a dependency of one of my modules so I didn't take this package when Patrice offered his packages prior to the mass branching.

Comment 11 Dennis Gilmore 2010-05-18 18:43:53 UTC
OK

CVS Done