Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at

Bug 219539

Summary: Review Request: qt-qsa - QT Script for Applications
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Julian Sikorski <belegdol>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Michał Bentkowski <mr.ecik>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: chitlesh, rdieter
Target Milestone: ---Flags: kevin: fedora-cvs+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-12-22 00:22:57 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 163779    

Description Julian Sikorski 2006-12-13 20:54:39 UTC
Spec URL:
Description: Qt Script for Applications can be used to build scripable applications with Qt

Package builds fine inside mock. RPM is not completely silent, but I have fixed a bit more warnings/errors than qt4-qsa. The ones that still persist are as follows:
E: qsa configure-without-libdir-spec

rpmlint qsa-devel-1.1.4-1.i386.rpm
E: qsa-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
W: qsa-devel hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/qsa-devel-1.1.4/examples/spreadsheet/.examplefiles
W: qsa-devel hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/qsa-devel-1.1.4/examples/spreadsheet/.examplefiles

This package will add qsa support for qt3.

Comment 1 Frank Büttner 2006-12-13 20:57:11 UTC
We still have an QSA Package inside FC Extras.

Comment 2 Julian Sikorski 2006-12-13 21:04:40 UTC
but the one you have packaged is for qt4 and does not work with qt3.

Comment 3 Frank Büttner 2006-12-13 21:07:01 UTC
Because 1.2.1 can only run with Qt4.

Comment 4 Julian Sikorski 2006-12-13 21:10:44 UTC
Indeed. That's why I packaged 1.1.4

Comment 5 Julian Sikorski 2006-12-13 21:12:22 UTC
To clarify: qsa and qt4-qsa can be installed simultaneously, independently of
each other.

Comment 6 Frank Büttner 2006-12-13 21:28:11 UTC
Yes but an better name will be qt3-qsa.

Comment 7 Julian Sikorski 2006-12-13 21:32:57 UTC
Well, possibly. I can change that with next release. I can ask at tomorrow's
FESCO meeting as well.

Comment 8 Julian Sikorski 2006-12-14 09:17:57 UTC
Well, how about qt-qsa?

Comment 9 Michał Bentkowski 2006-12-20 19:48:38 UTC
I'll do the review.
Well, the first problem I noticed is non-building in mock:
RPM build errors:
    File not found by glob: /var/tmp/qsa-1.1.4-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/
    File not found: /var/tmp/qsa-1.1.4-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/

Also, before I make a full review, I recommend to get rid of dos2unix and use
sed instead.

Comment 10 Michał Bentkowski 2006-12-20 20:04:35 UTC
In order to remove an error I mentioned above you have to simply delete
%ifarch lines in the beginning of the spec file.

Comment 11 Julian Sikorski 2006-12-20 20:22:44 UTC
Spec URL:
New release:
- Added missing headers
- Renamed to qt-qsa
- Got rif of dos2unix BuildRequires
- Fixed building on x86-64

I did not add Provides and Obsoletes because i don't think it's necessary in
such an early stage of review process.

Comment 12 Michał Bentkowski 2006-12-20 21:11:32 UTC
MUST items:
 * rpmlint output:
E: qt-qsa-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
W: qt-qsa-devel hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/qt-qsa-devel-1.1.4/examples/
W: qt-qsa-devel hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/qt-qsa-devel-1.1.4/examples/
E: qt-qsa configure-without-libdir-spec
it looks like we can ignore all the issues
 * package is named well
 * spec file name is good
 * package meets Packaging Guidelines
 * package is licensed with a GPL open-source compatible license
 * License field in spec file matches actual license
 * license file is included in %doc
 * md5sums are matching (24eb504e51de3a04161f6df8c39c24ac)
 * package successfully compiles on x86_64
 * BuildRequires listed well
 * no locales
 * %post and %postun sections present
 * relocatable
 * package owns directories well
 * no duplicates in %files
 * every %files section includes %defattr
 * proper %clean section
 * macros used well
!* -devel subpackage presents, but needs to have an additional dependency

THINGS to do:
 * qt-qsa-devel stores its files in %{_libdir}/qt-3.3/{include,mkspecs/
features} which
are owned by qt-devel so you need to append a qt-devel dependency to devel 

Fix that and package will be approved.

Comment 13 Julian Sikorski 2006-12-20 21:22:21 UTC
Spec URL:
New release:
- Fixed typo in %%changelog
- Added qt-devel to -devel subpackage Requires

Comment 14 Michał Bentkowski 2006-12-20 21:25:17 UTC
It looks good right now.

Comment 15 Chitlesh GOORAH 2010-07-18 10:45:25 UTC
Package Change Request
Package Name: qt-qsa
Short Description:  QT Script for Applications
Owners: chitlesh
Branches: EL-5 EL-6

Comment 16 Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-19 04:29:04 UTC
cvs done.