Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 2227752

Summary: Review Request: rust-octseq - Abstractions for types representing octet sequences
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Petr Menšík <pemensik>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Fabio Valentini <decathorpe>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: decathorpe, package-review, rust-sig
Target Milestone: ---Flags: decathorpe: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: https://crates.io/crates/octseq
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-08-10 00:42:27 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2080743    

Description Petr Menšík 2023-07-31 09:48:51 UTC
Spec URL: https://pemensik.fedorapeople.org/rust-octseq.spec
SRPM URL: https://pemensik.fedorapeople.org/rust-octseq-0.2.0-1.fc39.src.rpm

Description:
Abstractions for types representing octet sequences.

Fedora Account System Username: pemensik

Comment 1 Petr Menšík 2023-07-31 09:48:55 UTC
This package built on koji:  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=104171462

Comment 2 Petr Menšík 2023-07-31 09:53:13 UTC
New dependency required by rust-domain version 0.8.0.

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2023-07-31 09:54:26 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6224966
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2227752-rust-octseq/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06224966-rust-octseq/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 4 Fabio Valentini 2023-07-31 12:32:39 UTC
I still don't know what this is about:

> %global forgeurl0 https://github.com/NLnetLabs/octseq
> VCS:            git:%{forgeurl0}

but if you want to keep maintaining this information in the spec file, that's fine with me.

===

Package was generated with rust2rpm, simplifying the review.

- package builds and installs without errors on rawhide
- test suite is run and all unit tests pass
- latest version of the crate is packaged
- license matches upstream specification (BSD-3-Clause) and is acceptable for Fedora
- license file is included with %license in %files
- package complies with Rust Packaging Guidelines

Package APPROVED.

===

Recommended post-import rust-sig tasks:

- set up package on release-monitoring.org:
  project: $crate
  homepage: https://crates.io/crates/$crate
  backend: crates.io
  version scheme: semantic
  version filter: alpha;beta;rc;pre
  distro: Fedora
  Package: rust-$crate

- add @rust-sig with "commit" access as package co-maintainer
  (should happen automatically)

- set bugzilla assignee overrides to @rust-sig (optional)

- track package in koschei for all built branches
  (should happen automatically once rust-sig is co-maintainer)

Comment 5 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2023-07-31 13:55:29 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-octseq

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2023-08-01 09:08:01 UTC
FEDORA-2023-c1fd6f96c7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-c1fd6f96c7

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2023-08-01 09:09:20 UTC
FEDORA-2023-ce1b6f7a75 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-ce1b6f7a75

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2023-08-02 01:37:51 UTC
FEDORA-2023-c1fd6f96c7 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-c1fd6f96c7 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-c1fd6f96c7

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2023-08-02 01:40:22 UTC
FEDORA-2023-ce1b6f7a75 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-ce1b6f7a75 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-ce1b6f7a75

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2023-08-05 02:14:05 UTC
FEDORA-2023-ce1b6f7a75 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-ce1b6f7a75 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-ce1b6f7a75

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2023-08-10 00:42:27 UTC
FEDORA-2023-c1fd6f96c7 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2023-08-12 04:20:14 UTC
FEDORA-2023-ce1b6f7a75 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.