Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 2253842

Summary:	lilypond package broken due to Ghostscript update
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Jean Abou Samra <jean>
Component:	lilypond	Assignee:	Gwyn Ciesla <gwync>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	urgent	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	39	CC:	gwync, i
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	lilypond-2.25.11-1.fc39 lilypond-2.25.11-1.fc38	Doc Type:	---
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2023-12-20 01:24:56 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jean Abou Samra 2023-12-10 08:46:53 UTC

Ghostscript 10.02.1 has reached Fedora 39. This update breaks LilyPond due to

https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6675

In short, Ghostscript 10.02.1 includes a security fix that removes an insecure function, but the function was used by LilyPond.

This has already been addressed in LilyPond, please update from 2.25.4 to the latest version, 2.25.10.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. echo "{ c' }" > tmp.ly
2. lilypond tmp.ly
Actual Results:  
Converting to `tmp.pdf'...
warning: `(gs -q -dNODISPLAY -dNOSAFER -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -dAutoRotatePages=/None -dPrinted=false /tmp/lilypond-tmp-6950600)' failed (256)

/usr/share/lilypond/2.25.4/ly/init.ly:64:2: error: Guile signaled an error for the expression beginning here
#
 (let ((book-handler (if (defined? 'default-toplevel-book-handler)
Throw to key `ly-file-failed' with args `()'.


Expected Results:  
Compilation succeeds.

Comment 1 Fedora Update System 2023-12-11 15:30:22 UTC

FEDORA-2023-66e49b1f7e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-66e49b1f7e

Comment 2 Fedora Update System 2023-12-12 01:30:31 UTC

FEDORA-2023-0d955e12c8 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-0d955e12c8`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-0d955e12c8

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2023-12-12 02:39:41 UTC

FEDORA-2023-66e49b1f7e has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-66e49b1f7e`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-66e49b1f7e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2023-12-20 01:24:56 UTC

FEDORA-2023-0d955e12c8 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2023-12-20 02:33:36 UTC

FEDORA-2023-66e49b1f7e has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.