Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 228279

Summary: Review Request: hunspell-bg - Bulgarian hunspell dictionary
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Caolan McNamara <caolanm>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: manuel wolfshant <wolfy>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: wolfy
Target Milestone: ---Flags: wolfy: fedora-review+
notting: fedora-cvs+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-02-14 09:41:17 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 163779    

Description Caolan McNamara 2007-02-12 14:18:10 UTC
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-bg.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-bg-0.20040405-1.src.rpm
Description: Bulgarian hunspell dictionary

1) http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Dictionaries#Bulgarian_.28Bulgaria.29
2) GPL
3) splits this dictionary out of OOo to becomes a standalone package which can be independently updated and reused by other applications, e.g. firefox when it moves to hunspell

very similar to #227811

Comment 1 manuel wolfshant 2007-02-12 15:30:21 UTC
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines 
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream , sha1sum 949cff5c527a1dd8c0ec4b6035a34a50e81ec7af 
bg_BG.zip
- the package builds in mock, devel/x86_64, generates a noarch (which is
consistent with the fact that basically it includes only 3 text files)
- the license GPL stated in the tag seems identical to the one included (in
Bulgarian..) in the sources
- there are only 2 files (word lists) + a short doc with instructions and
license clearance, so no .la, .pc, static files
- no missing BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all files/directories that it creates, does not take ownership of other
files/dirs
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- rpmlint is silent on both source and binary rpm
- code, not content
- no need for -docs as the only doc is just a 2.5K text file
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file 

APPROVED

Comment 2 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-02-13 05:56:03 UTC
Well, for now, until new review process makes clear,
please mark the reviewer as assigner as before (not
merge review).

Comment 3 Caolan McNamara 2007-02-14 09:41:17 UTC
 27537 (hunspell-bg): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded.