Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 234484
Summary: | Review Request: dtc - device tree compiler | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Arnd Bergmann <arnd> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | David Woodhouse <dwmw2> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora, gwync, jwboyer, pbonzini |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | fedora:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-01-22 13:11:01 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 163779 |
Description
Arnd Bergmann
2007-03-29 16:18:23 UTC
spec url should have been http://www.lazybastard.org/~arnd/dtc.spec, not dtc.git Change the Group and it looks OK. Approved. the srpm should have been http://www.lazybastard.org/~arnd/dtc-0-1.20070329git.src.rpm from the start, which is the one that matches the spec file. The version number changed to have the snapshot date in the release, not the version according to the packaging guidelines, and the group is now Development/Tools. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dtc Short Description: Device Tree Compiler Owners: arnd Branches: FC-7 InitialCC: Setting flags properly: fedora-review + (dwmw2 approved it and I took another look and approve it hereby, too; I sponsored arnd) fedora-cvs ?, for cvs request in comment #4 So it seems I missed this review and submitted my own package. Arnd, do you want to maintain dtc in Fedora? It seems you never imported the package. If not, I'll take it. Arnd and I discussed dtc maintainership this morning. We're going to co-maintain it. Time for another cvs request: Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: foobar Updated Fedora Owners: arnd, jwboyer.org *** Bug 246186 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Don't forget to close Review Request tickets. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: dtc New Branches: el6 Owners: bonzini Are the existing maintainers OK with you owning the EL-6 branch? (In reply to comment #11) > Are the existing maintainers OK with you owning the EL-6 branch? Yeah, we don't care. Though I have no idea why dtc would be wanted in EL6. libfdt is a prerequisite for QEMU. Having libfdt-devel in EL6 makes it easier to develop upstream QEMU under RHEL6. Ping? Re-setting the cvs flag. Git done (by process-git-requests). |