Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 248
Summary: | Is libgsl a bit broken? | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | paulmatthews |
Component: | gsl | Assignee: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 5.2 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 1998-12-03 17:16:02 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
paulmatthews
1998-12-01 12:31:56 UTC
[Additional information] I downloaded the new gsl library from the gnu site, compiled it up, rewrote the test program to fit the new api, and it failed in exactly the same way. Either they are doing something consistently wrong, or I'm misssing something very obvious. If this is a "your holding your mouth the wrong way" type of thing I'm going to look silly... [ARRG] No it's me. Where's my gun. gcc -o fft fft.c -lgslfft -lgslerr -lm This works OK. It's where you put the libraries on the command line. I can't believe I've never noticed this before. |