Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 456241

Summary: "INFO: possible recursive locking detected" with 2.6.27-0.166.rc0.git8.fc10.i686
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Tom London <selinux>
Component: kernelAssignee: Kernel Maintainer List <kernel-maint>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhide   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-10-27 03:31:36 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 438944    

Description Tom London 2008-07-22 13:35:37 UTC
Description of problem:
I get the following with every boot of -0.166 (but the backtraces vary slight).

System is Thinkpad X60 running latest rawhide.

firmware: requesting iwlwifi-3945-1.ucode
iscsi: registered transport (iser)
Registered led device: iwl-phy0:radio
Registered led device: iwl-phy0:assoc
Registered led device: iwl-phy0:RX
Registered led device: iwl-phy0:TX

=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.27-0.166.rc0.git8.fc10.i686 #1
---------------------------------------------
NetworkManager/2524 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&dev->addr_list_lock){-...}, at: [<c060b6b8>] dev_mc_sync+0x1c/0x59

but task is already holding lock:
 (&dev->addr_list_lock){-...}, at: [<c06075e6>] dev_set_rx_mode+0x19/0x2b

other info that might help us debug this:
2 locks held by NetworkManager/2524:
 #0:  (rtnl_mutex){--..}, at: [<c061079a>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x17/0x2b
 #1:  (&dev->addr_list_lock){-...}, at: [<c06075e6>] dev_set_rx_mode+0x19/0x2b

stack backtrace:
Pid: 2524, comm: NetworkManager Not tainted 2.6.27-0.166.rc0.git8.fc10.i686 #1
 [<c044ae2b>] __lock_acquire+0x6b6/0x975
 [<c0449482>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x15/0x91
 [<c044a08e>] ? mark_held_locks+0x4e/0x66
 [<c044a210>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xe3/0x11a
 [<c044a252>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0xd
 [<c044b154>] lock_acquire+0x6a/0x90
 [<c060b6b8>] ? dev_mc_sync+0x1c/0x59
 [<c067b852>] _spin_lock_bh+0x26/0x53
 [<c060b6b8>] ? dev_mc_sync+0x1c/0x59
 [<c060b6b8>] dev_mc_sync+0x1c/0x59
 [<f921aaf5>] ieee80211_set_multicast_list+0xd9/0xe1 [mac80211]
 [<c06073ff>] __dev_set_rx_mode+0x89/0x8c
 [<c06075ed>] dev_set_rx_mode+0x20/0x2b
 [<c060921e>] dev_open+0x96/0xb9
 [<c0608c31>] dev_change_flags+0xa1/0x154
 [<c060facc>] ? rtnl_setlink+0x0/0xdb
 [<c060fa1a>] do_setlink+0x26b/0x31d
 [<c067b640>] ? _read_unlock+0x22/0x25
 [<c060facc>] ? rtnl_setlink+0x0/0xdb
 [<c060fba3>] rtnl_setlink+0xd7/0xdb
 [<c061094b>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x19d/0x1b7
 [<c06107ae>] ? rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x0/0x1b7
 [<c061e4a2>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x35/0x7b
 [<c06107a6>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x23/0x2b
 [<c061e09c>] netlink_unicast+0xf6/0x14c
 [<c061e329>] netlink_sendmsg+0x237/0x244
 [<c05fcf98>] __sock_sendmsg+0x4a/0x53
 [<c05fd7a8>] sock_sendmsg+0xbd/0xd3
 [<c043e016>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
 [<c043e016>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
 [<c041dd7e>] ? need_resched+0x18/0x22
 [<c051341b>] ? copy_from_user+0x3e/0x125
 [<c0603fd2>] ? verify_iovec+0x45/0x73
 [<c05fd902>] sys_sendmsg+0x144/0x197
 [<c05fe391>] ? sys_recvmsg+0x11b/0x180
 [<c0449482>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x15/0x91
 [<c0449509>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd
 [<c040892f>] ? native_sched_clock+0xac/0xc8
 [<c04087b3>] ? sched_clock+0x8/0xb
 [<c0448a92>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0x1a/0x115
 [<c044a226>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xf9/0x11a
 [<c044a252>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0xd
 [<c04245c4>] ? hrtick_set+0x7f/0xdf
 [<c0679c58>] ? schedule+0x6fb/0x71a
 [<c05fe8b3>] sys_socketcall+0x170/0x18d
 [<c040a2fa>] ? syscall_trace_enter+0xa1/0xb5
 [<c0403c0a>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
 [<c067007b>] ? agp_amd64_probe+0xd8/0x458
 =======================
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
kernel-2.6.27-0.166.rc0.git8.fc10.i686

How reproducible:
Every boot

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Tom London 2008-08-12 17:42:24 UTC
No longer see this with current kernels.

Close?