Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 456534
| Summary: | perl back to requiring perl-devel by default | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jeremy Katz <katzj> |
| Component: | perl | Assignee: | Stepan Kasal <kasal> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | kasal, rc040203, robin.norwood, tcallawa |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2008-08-08 13:48:40 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 438944 | ||
|
Description
Jeremy Katz
2008-07-24 14:08:25 UTC
You are suggesting that perl-devel crept in as a requirement of
perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker. We cannot see anything like that.
The default package list contains a meta-package named "perl-core," which is
proud to deliver "all of the perl bits and modules in the upstream tarball."
Indeed, the perl-core requires enlists them all: perl-devel, perl-ExtUtils-*,
perl-Test-*, perl-CPAN, and perl-Module-Build.
It seems perl-core is part of the default instalation.
What is the right solution here?
Perhaps perl-core might be split into two parts:
One would be named "perl-core-devel" or "perl-apple," would get the original
description ("all of the perl...", see above) and would require perl-core and
the development packages mentioned above.
The other one would be named "perl-core," and would maintain the rest of the
current huge requires list.
The base install would contain perl-core, but not perl-core-devel.
What do you think?
With today's rawhide, that is not the case. perl-core is not listed in comps and the dep tree pulling perl-devel is from [katzj@aglarond comps]$ rpm -qpR ~/trees/rawhide/i386/Packages/perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.36-38.fc10.i386.rpm |grep devel perl-devel [katzj@aglarond comps]$ rpm -qpR ~/trees/rawhide/i386/Packages/perl-5.10.0-38.fc10.i386.rpm |grep MakeMaker perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) [katzj@aglarond comps]$ grep perl-core comps-f10.xml.in [katzj@aglarond comps]$ With F9 gold booted straight off the livecd [root@localhost ~]# rpm -qR perl |grep MakeMaker [root@localhost ~]# (Oh, I examined obsolete rpms, sorry.) You are right. That unfortunate dependency appeared first in perl-5.10.0-37.fc10. Thank you for your report and for your patience explaining it to me. ;-) After a quick examination, I cannot see anything in the diff which would warrant the change, so I'm afraid it's caused by a change in the build environment. (That is to be confirmed by a scratch build.) Stay tuned. The problem was caused by enc2xs templates .../Encode/*.e2x, which, unlike the enc2x script itself, were packed in the main perl package. Fixed in perl-5.10.0-39.fc10. |