Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 468618
Summary: | over-enthusiastic subpackaging | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot> |
Component: | un-core-fonts | Assignee: | Jens Petersen <petersen> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fonts-bugs, i18n-bugs, petersen, smallvil |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-08-31 09:26:34 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 438944 |
Description
Nicolas Mailhot
2008-10-26 19:28:41 UTC
(and same for light when it's available like for dinaru) Do you think we should make an exception for dotum though since it will pull in another 2.5MB for all users? 4.6M un-core-fonts-dotum-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc10.noarch.rpm 2.5M un-core-fonts-dotumbold-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc10.noarch.rpm I don't like exceptions much, you end up removing them later generally. And I tend to believe that anyone who's actually interested in dotum will want the bold too. I suppose dotum is a special case because want to install korean support for everyone by default, even for people who didn't ask for it (but is it really ok to provide korean without bold when we have it available?). If we're that short of space for F10 you can make it an exception, but IMHO it will end up in the default install set in a few releases anyway. BTW if the problem is that the current macros used in this package want to take a single font file as argument, then the subpackaging macro I wrote in dejavu yesterday could be used instead. I must admit I was thinking very hard about the un font packages when I wrote them. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Actually it is worse that that since currently the main packages also contain the bold (and light) fonts... Should be fixed in 1.0.2-0.9.080608. |