Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 470885

Summary: conflicts when upgrading to xorg-x11-server-devel-1.5.2-12.fc10
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jim Radford <radford>
Component: xorg-x11-serverAssignee: Adam Jackson <ajax>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 10CC: seventhguardian, xgl-maint
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: EasyFix
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-10-29 23:09:50 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 432388    

Description Jim Radford 2008-11-10 18:58:30 UTC
file /usr/include/xorg/xorg-server.h conflicts between attempted installs of xorg-x11-server-devel-1.5.2-12.fc10.x86_64 and xorg-x11-server-devel-1.5.2-12.fc10.i386

Looks like the old versions had the same problem too.

  $ rpm -q xorg-x11-server-devel
  xorg-x11-server-devel-1.5.2-10.fc10.x86_64
  xorg-x11-server-devel-1.5.2-10.fc10.i386

  $ rpm -qV xorg-x11-server-devel | grep /usr/include/xorg/xorg-server.h
  S.5....T    /usr/include/xorg/xorg-server.h

Comment 1 Bug Zapper 2008-11-26 05:08:47 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle.
Changing version to '10'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 2 seventhguardian 2009-10-16 07:35:52 UTC
A long time has passed. Is this still an issue?

Comment 3 Adam Jackson 2009-10-29 23:09:50 UTC
Only thing causing this is the _XSERVER64 define.

Fixed in 1.7.1-2.fc12