Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 472442

Summary:	NetworkManager-glib-devel BuildRequires breaks s390x
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Brad Hinson <bhinson>
Component:	PackageKit	Assignee:	Richard Hughes <richard>
Status:	CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	10	CC:	hpicht, lmacken, rhughes, richard, robin.norwood, tuxbrewr
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	s390x
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-02-16 16:12:13 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	467765

Description Brad Hinson 2008-11-20 20:49:00 UTC

Description of problem:
Currently NetworkManager has ExcludeArch s390x, which means as-is, PackageKit doesn't build, due to PackageKit BuildRequires NetworkManager-glib-devel.

On s390x, rpmbuild without NetworkManager-glib-devel installed (forced with --nodeps) builds successfully.  Can we add "%ifnarch s390 s390x" around this BuildRequires?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
PackageKit-0.3.10-2.fc9

Comment 1 Richard Hughes 2008-11-21 11:02:25 UTC

Is the NetworkManager build failure on s390x fixable? I would rather get NM fixed on s390x rather than cut the PK dependency chain. If NM is 100% unbuildable on s390x (which seems odd to me) then I guess we can ifdef the dep.

Comment 2 Bug Zapper 2008-11-26 05:42:11 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle.
Changing version to '10'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping