Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 539119

Summary: FTBFS xdvik-22.84.14-7.fc12
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: FTBFS <ftbfs>
Component: xdvikAssignee: Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: rawhideCC: jnovy, jonathan.underwood, pertusus
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mock-results/
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-01-27 17:54:49 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 538681    
Attachments:
Description Flags
root.log
none
build.log
none
mock.log
none
root.log
none
build.log
none
mock.log none

Description FTBFS 2009-11-19 16:52:18 UTC
xdvik-22.84.14-7.fc12.src.rpm Failed To Build From Source against the rawhide tree.  See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS for more information.

Comment 1 FTBFS 2009-11-19 16:52:22 UTC
Setting to ASSIGNED per Fedora Bug Triage workflow.  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow

Comment 2 FTBFS 2009-11-19 16:52:25 UTC
Created attachment 371723 [details]
root.log

root.log for i386

Comment 3 FTBFS 2009-11-19 16:52:28 UTC
Created attachment 371724 [details]
build.log

build.log for i386

Comment 4 FTBFS 2009-11-19 16:52:29 UTC
Created attachment 371725 [details]
mock.log

mock.log for i386

Comment 5 FTBFS 2009-11-19 16:52:31 UTC
Created attachment 371726 [details]
root.log

root.log for x86_64

Comment 6 FTBFS 2009-11-19 16:52:33 UTC
Created attachment 371727 [details]
build.log

build.log for x86_64

Comment 7 FTBFS 2009-11-19 16:52:34 UTC
Created attachment 371728 [details]
mock.log

mock.log for x86_64

Comment 8 Jonathan Underwood 2010-01-27 17:01:47 UTC
Jindrich - not sure what's changed here with the texlive packages, it seems to be failing as there's no texmf tree at  at /usr/share/texmf - has something changed? I didn't think you dropped tl2009 into rawhide, yet but perhaps you did?

Comment 9 Jonathan Underwood 2010-01-27 17:54:49 UTC
OK, adding a BuildRequires for tex(tex) seems to have fixed this. Fixed build pushed:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1948732

Comment 10 Jindrich Novy 2010-01-28 18:51:38 UTC
(In reply to comment #8)
> Jindrich - not sure what's changed here with the texlive packages, it seems to
> be failing as there's no texmf tree at  at /usr/share/texmf - has something
> changed? I didn't think you dropped tl2009 into rawhide, yet but perhaps you
> did?    

Hi Jonathan, I'm not quite sure what broke as it seems that %{_texmf_main} doesn't simply get defined anywhere. In any case usage of virtual provides such as tex(tex) or tex(latex) is the best way how to ensure it is defined. Some old package even use the old styled tetex-* deps which are not guaranteed to work any more.