Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 550642

Summary: [abrt] crash detected in freeciv-2.1.9-2.fc12
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: thanosk <thanosk>
Component: freecivAssignee: Brian Pepple <bdpepple>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 12CC: bdpepple
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:efdace25de534122b1c6b5e25355ace1fa45ed67
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-02-24 16:48:17 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description thanosk 2009-12-26 16:08:35 UTC
abrt 1.0.0 detected a crash.

Comment
-----
I was running civclient from the terminal and I noticed the following msg after the actual crash 
civclient: messagewin_common.c:165: get_message: Assertion `message_index >= 0 && message_index < messages_total' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)

Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: civclient -P none
component: freeciv
executable: /usr/bin/civclient
kernel: 2.6.31.6-166.fc12.i686.PAE
package: freeciv-2.1.9-2.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process was terminated by signal 6

Comment 1 thanosk 2009-12-26 16:08:38 UTC
Created attachment 380436 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-02-24 16:48:17 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 549712 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-02-24 16:48:17 UTC
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #549712.

Sorry for the inconvenience.