Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 651656 (ghc-ltk)
| Summary: | Review Request: ghc-ltk - A UI toolkit for Leksah | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002> | ||||
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Jens Petersen <petersen> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, haskell-devel, notting | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | petersen:
fedora-review+
j: fedora-cvs+ |
||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | ghc-ltk-0.10.0.4-2.fc14 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2011-05-29 00:04:33 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Bug Depends On: | 651613 | ||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 664140 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Narasimhan
2010-11-10 02:16:48 UTC
I will update the spec file to cabal2spec 0.22.4 and provide the new links. (In reply to comment #1) > I will update the spec file to cabal2spec 0.22.4 and provide the new links. Please do - cabal2spec-0.22.5 is now available. Updated build for f14. I need to make some modifications to the spec file in order to make ltk build for f15 and rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2947696 http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-ltk.spec http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-ltk-0.8.0.8-2.fc14.src.rpm rpmlint -i *.rpm *.spec ghc-ltk.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Leksah -> Leks ah, Leks-ah, Leukas The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-ltk.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Leksah -> Leks ah, Leks-ah, Leukas The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-ltk-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Leksah -> Leks ah, Leks-ah, Leukas The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-ltk-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-ltk-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-ltk-prof.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Leksah -> Leks ah, Leks-ah, Leukas The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-ltk-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-ltk-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/ltk-0.8.0.8/libHSltk-0.8.0.8_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings. Thanks I send a patch for darcs head upstream to get it to build with haskell-platform-2011. Not sure when they plan to release 0.9. Ok, thanks. I will use the patch to build for f15 and rawhide. Sorry, leksah-0.10 is now on hackage. So probably it is better to update to ltk-0.10.0 so we can do this review in rawhide koji. Ok, i will update the spec to build 0.10. in a couple of days. Spec file: http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-ltk.spec SRPM link: http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-ltk-0.10.0-1.fc14.src.rpm rpmlint -i *.rpm ghc-ltk-0.10.0-1.fc15.src/ghc-ltk.spec ghc-ltk.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Leksah -> Leks ah, Leks-ah, Leukas The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-ltk.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Leksah -> Leks ah, Leks-ah, Leukas The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-ltk-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Leksah -> Leks ah, Leks-ah, Leukas The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-ltk-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-ltk-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-ltk-prof.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Leksah -> Leks ah, Leks-ah, Leukas The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-ltk-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-ltk-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-7.0.2/ltk-0.10.0/libHSltk-0.10.0_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings. BTW latest upstream version is now 0.10.0.4 which should also build with parsec-3. Sorry for sitting on this forever and a day: I just submitted PackagingDrafts/Haskell for comments and I start the review now. >Sorry for sitting on this forever and a day: Np. I got ghc-binary-shared reviewed and updated. >I just submitted PackagingDrafts/Haskell for comments >and I start the review now. Great. I will provide my comments, if any. http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-ltk-0.10.0.4-1.fc14.src.rpm http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-ltk.spec pmlint -i ghc-ltk-*10.0.4*.rpm ../../SRPMS/ghc-ltk-0.10.0.4-1.fc14.src.rpm ghc-ltk.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Leksah -> Leks ah, Leks-ah, Leukas The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-ltk-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Leksah -> Leks ah, Leks-ah, Leukas The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-ltk-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-ltk-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-ltk-prof.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Leksah -> Leks ah, Leks-ah, Leukas The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-ltk-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-ltk-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/ltk-0.10.0.4/libHSltk-0.10.0.4_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. ghc-ltk.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Leksah -> Leks ah, Leks-ah, Leukas The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings BTW latest upstream version is now 0.10.0.4 which should also build with parsec-3. Sorry for sitting on this forever and a day: last week I finally submitted the revised PackagingDrafts/Haskell for comments and I will post my review here shortly. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3044757 Here is the review: +:ok, !: needs attention, NA: not applicable MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint output ghc-ltk.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Leksah -> Leks ah, Leks-ah, Levkas 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. ghc-ltk.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Leksah -> Leks ah, Leks-ah, Levkas 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. ghc-ltk-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Leksah -> Leks ah, Leks-ah, Levkas 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. ghc-ltk-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-ltk-devel ghc-ltk-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Leksah -> Leks ah, Leks-ah, Levkas ghc-ltk-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-ltk-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/ltk-0.10.0/libHSltk-0.10.0_p.a 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. [+] MUST: Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name} [+] MUST: Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: Licensing Guidelines [!] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license. License is ok but it is unfortunately unclear from the source headers what exact version of GPL is intended: eg GPLv2 vs GPLv2+ say. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F Hence going by point (4) there since only the LICENSE (COPYING) file mentions GPLv2+, but the version is not specified explicitly in the source tree, we have to assume GPL+ (ie any version of GPL) for now. Can you please contact upstream to clarify the intended GPL version and ask them to state it in the source. The best way to do this would actually be to add the usual "GPL version or later" paragraph as a header to each source file. I am afraid the same problem also seems to exist for leksah and leksah-server afaics, so best to mention them all altogether probably. In the meantime the package can be license tagged GPL+ to avoid further delay until upstream has clarified and hopes updates in a coming release. [+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English and be legible. [+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release a520300be890862ae0d816adbd67d198 ltk-0.10.0.tar.gz [+] MUST: must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on one main arch [+] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [NA] MUST: use %find_lang macro for .po translations [NA] MUST: packages which store shared library files in the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [NA] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [NA] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [NA] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [NA] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. Package is APPROVED. Created attachment 496278 [details]
ghc-ltk.spec-1.patch
Little patch to cleanup formatting.
Needs a changelog entry explaining the license field.
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-ltk Short Description: A UI toolkit for Leksah Owners: narasim Branches: f13 f14 f15 InitialCC: haskell-sig Git done (by process-git-requests). ghc-ltk-0.10.0.4-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-ltk-0.10.0.4-2.fc14 ghc-ltk-0.10.0.4-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-ltk-0.10.0.4-2.fc15 ghc-ltk-0.10.0.4-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. ghc-ltk-0.10.0.4-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. ghc-ltk-0.10.0.4-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. |