Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 671106
Summary: | Review Request: perl-Mail-MboxParser - Read-only access to UNIX-mailboxes | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Matěj Cepl <mcepl> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, mcepl, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | mcepl:
fedora-review+
j: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-11-29 07:30:06 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 622502 |
Description
Marcela Mašláňová
2011-01-20 11:34:36 UTC
For consideration: ******************* You don't have Mail::Mbox::MessageParser installed. If you want to get significantly faster parsing, you should install this module from the CPAN. If you do so, you are advised to do it before issuing 'make test' on this module because otherwise the new parsing routines can't be tested on your platform. ******************* Shouldn't we pull in Mail::Mbox::MessageParser as well? + GOOD: rpmlint is happy jakoubek:build $ rpmlint -i SRPMS/perl-Mail-MboxParser-0.55-1.fc15.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. jakoubek:build $ rpmlint -i RPMS/noarch/perl-Mail-MboxParser-0.55-1.fc15.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. jakoubek:build $ + GOOD: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + GOOD: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + GOOD: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. + GOOD: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Actually it should be GPLv2 only (not GPLv2+ ... cannot find anywhere "or later"). + GOOD: COPYRIGHT file is in %doc. No problem, it is not included in the tarball either. + GOOD: The spec file is written in American English. + GOOD: The spec file for the package is legible. + GOOD: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5: 1b9fdb367db36ec94e7b5c6721f11221 + GOOD: The package successfully compiles and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. yes, builds in koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2733008 + GOOD: it's noarch so no issues with other architectures. + GOOD: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + GOOD: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. No locale support. + GOOD: %post and %postun scripts OK no scripts + GOOD: not relocatable + GOOD: A package owns all directories that it creates. + GOOD: A package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + GOOD: Permissions on files are set automatically. + GOOD: Each package have a %clean section. + GOOD: Each package consistently use macros. + GOOD: The package contains code, or permissible content. + GOOD: No large documentation files, so no a -doc subpackage. + GOOD: Files registered in %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. + GOOD: No header files. + GOOD: No static libraries. + GOOD: No pkgconfig(.pc) files. + GOOD: .so file is provided in -devel package. no .so outside of Perllands + GOOD: Correct Requires in -devel subpackage. no -devel package + GOOD: No .la libtool archives. + GOOD: Packages does not contain GUI applications. + GOOD: Packages does not own files or directories owned by other packages. - BAD : Runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %install No, why? + GOOD: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. + GOOD: Includes license text. Please, fix %install section. With that APPROVED. (explanation: I would like to have this package for EL-5, so an explicit BuildRoot would be helpful). rm -rf it's also not needed with new rpm. I will create different spec for EL-5 and add the mentioned requirement. APPROVED New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Mail-MboxParser Short Description: Read-only access to UNIX-mailboxes Owners: mmaslano psabata ppisar Branches: F-13 F-14 EL-5 EL-6 InitialCC: perl-sig Git done (by process-git-requests). It's dependent on in EL branches on update of https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/perl-Mail-Mbox-MessageParser perl-Mail-MboxParser-0.55-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Mail-MboxParser-0.55-2.el5 perl-Mail-MboxParser-0.55-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Mail-MboxParser-0.55-2.el6 perl-Mail-MboxParser-0.55-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. perl-Mail-MboxParser-0.55-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |