Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 695144

Summary: yumex can't find pytthon module "gconf" in LXDE environment
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: G.Wolfe Woodbury <redwolfe>
Component: yumexAssignee: Tim Lauridsen <tla>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 15CC: cwickert, foxcool333, lukas+fedora, maycon.franca, tla
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: yumex-3.0.3-1.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-03 04:49:31 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 505781    

Description G.Wolfe Woodbury 2011-04-10 21:39:09 UTC
Description of problem:
   In the Beta.RC2 LXDE live spin yumex cannot run due to a module "gconf" not found error:
[lxgw@lxde-nightly ~]$ yumex
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/share/yumex/yumex.py", line 25, in <module>
    from yumexgui import YumexApplication
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yumexgui/__init__.py", line 34, in <module>
    from yumexgui.gui import Notebook, PackageInfo, CompletedEntry, YumexStatusIcon
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yumexgui/gui.py", line 27, in <module>
    import gconf, subprocess
ImportError: No module named gconf


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
   yumex-3.0.2-1.fc15


How reproducible: every time


Steps to Reproduce:
1. install BETA.RC2 LXDE Live image to hard disk
2. run yumex from command line
3.
  
Actual results:
  traceback

Expected results:
  yumex runs

Additional info:
  in VBox guest with GConf2-gtk installed

Comment 2 Lukas Middendorf 2011-04-23 20:05:35 UTC
The fix indeed works. When will the rpm be updated?

Comment 3 Tim Lauridsen 2011-04-27 05:07:10 UTC
*** Bug 699130 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2011-04-27 06:57:56 UTC
yumex-3.0.3-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yumex-3.0.3-1.fc15

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2011-04-27 06:58:09 UTC
yumex-3.0.3-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yumex-3.0.3-1.fc14

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2011-04-27 06:58:23 UTC
yumex-3.0.3-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yumex-3.0.3-1.el6

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2011-04-27 20:20:05 UTC
Package yumex-3.0.3-1.el6:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing yumex-3.0.3-1.el6'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yumex-3.0.3-1.el6
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

Comment 8 Tim Lauridsen 2011-04-28 12:03:12 UTC
*** Bug 700314 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2011-05-03 04:49:21 UTC
yumex-3.0.3-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2011-05-07 02:50:30 UTC
yumex-3.0.3-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2011-05-14 00:00:19 UTC
yumex-3.0.3-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.