Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 73139
| Summary: | gnome-libs conflicts with db1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Jim Radford <radford> |
| Component: | gnome-libs | Assignee: | Havoc Pennington <hp> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 8.0 | CC: | katzj, notting |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | i386 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2006-02-21 18:49:32 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Jim Radford
2002-08-31 02:12:24 UTC
See explanation on #73138 - do we need an explicit Conflicts? The fact that the files conflict should be enough right... db1-devel isn't intended to be installable; the point of moving db1 into gnome-libs was to kill any compilation vs. db1. I think adding an explicit conflict is the least that should be done. Just leaving conflicting files seems rude. Do I have to crosscheck every file from every package just to decide what to install? Why not just leave db1 as a separate package? Clearly it is required by gnome-libs otherwise it wouldn't be there. Why hide that fact? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 58942 *** Changed to 'CLOSED' state since 'RESOLVED' has been deprecated. |