Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 769009

Summary: Impossible to remove packagekit
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Ignat Semenov <ragnarokk91>
Component: phonon-backend-gstreamerAssignee: Rex Dieter <rdieter>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 16CC: dennis, jreznik, jwulf, kevin, ltinkl, rdieter, rnovacek, ry, smparrish, tdfischer, than
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-19 22:35:26 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Ignat Semenov 2011-12-19 16:42:29 UTC
yum remove PackageKit lists all the KDE desktop as dependencies, offering to remove the whole desktop with the packagekit. This is weird, because a desktop does not depend on the package manager, it's the other way round. packagekit-qt may depend on Qt/KDE, but how do digikam, ktorrent and kwin depend on PK?

Please, fix the dependencies of the packagekit daemon in the KDE version of Fedora.

Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2011-12-19 20:03:13 UTC
Moving to kdebase for now.

Comment 2 Rex Dieter 2011-12-19 21:02:47 UTC
%changelog
* Tue Nov 15 2011 Rex Dieter <rdieter> 2:4.5.90-4
- drop hard dep on PackageKit-gstreamer-plugin

this change will get rolled into the next update released (hopefully when phonon, phonon-gstreamer 4.6 lands soonish)

Comment 3 Kevin Kofler 2011-12-19 22:35:26 UTC
Uhm, I though we had decided to keep the dependency in F16 due to upgrade path concerns…

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 694169 ***

Comment 4 Lee Newson 2012-03-05 05:46:42 UTC
*** Bug 766412 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***