Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 79298
Summary: | ~/gnome-desktop/Printer.desktop is missing | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Gene Czarcinski <gczarcinski> |
Component: | rootfiles | Assignee: | Bill Nottingham <notting> |
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Ben Levenson <benl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 9 | CC: | hp, rvokal, twaugh |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2003-10-27 19:12:47 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 79579, 100644 |
Description
Gene Czarcinski
2002-12-09 19:51:03 UTC
Tim -- I added you to the cc list since you seem to own printman Er.. can you explain what the problem is please? Beta2 has added printman and desktop-printing with /etc/skel/.gnome-desktop/Print.desktop for regular users. This file is "owned by" desktop printing which you (Tim) seem to currently handle (fortunately for me since I did not check who owned the file beforehand and just assumed it was part of printman). My point is that it should also be on root's desktop which means (to me) it probably needs to be added to the rootfiles package. Since you have been doing this printing stuff, I thought you should be copied since it is not an obvious rootfiles thing. If this is not appropriate, I am sorry and just delete yourself. I wonder whether root needs the icon. Lets put it this way -- now that it is there for regular users, I like it and find it useful. Consistency is certainly good. notting: what do you think the best solution is? Hm, yeah, it probably should be there. Or be in some sort of system-wide default icon list. But obligatory comment that logging into your desktop as root is unsupported and we shouldn't spend a lot of time caring about it. OBE |