Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 838162
Summary: | CVE-2012-3381 sblim-sfcb: insecure LD_LIBRARY_PATH usage [epel-5] | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Kurt Seifried <kseifried> |
Component: | sblim-sfcb | Assignee: | Vitezslav Crhonek <vcrhonek> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | el5 | CC: | pj.pandit, praveen_paladugu, srinivas_g_gowda, vcrhonek |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Security, SecurityTracking |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | fst_owner=pjp | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Release Note | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-08-29 12:19:05 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Kurt Seifried
2012-07-06 21:44:22 UTC
The patch seems to be available since long -> http://sourceforge.net/p/sblim/bugs/2499/#eadb Could you please have a look? Well, fixing this issue doesn't make much sense to me: 1) I wonder why sblim-sfcb is in EPEL, it's part of RHEL for longer time. Shouldn't it be removed from EPEL then? (I wasn't able to find it in Fedora packaging guidelines.) 2) low/low and it's resolved by using systemd in recent Fedora/RHEL releases. But okay, if you're interested... sblim-sfcb-1.3.8-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sblim-sfcb-1.3.8-2.el5 Hello Vitezslav, (In reply to Vitezslav Crhonek from comment #2) > Well, fixing this issue doesn't make much sense to me: > > 1) I wonder why sblim-sfcb is in EPEL, it's part of RHEL for longer time. > Shouldn't it be removed from EPEL then? (I wasn't able to find it in Fedora > packaging guidelines.) Yes, if the package is available via RHEL, it makes sense to retire it from EPEL repository. -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Please do retire it from EPEL. Thank you. Package sblim-sfcb-1.3.8-2.el5: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing sblim-sfcb-1.3.8-2.el5' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3849/sblim-sfcb-1.3.8-2.el5 then log in and leave karma (feedback). Hello Vitezslav, Did you have chance to file for its retirement from epel-5? Hi, thanks for reminder, done. EL5 branch has been retired. -> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/sblim-sfcb/ Closing this bug. |