Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 907398 (sigil-07)
Summary: | sigil-0.7.3 is available | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Upstream Release Monitoring <upstream-release-monitoring> |
Component: | sigil | Assignee: | Dan Horák <dan> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | alejandronova, dan, hdegoede, znmeb |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Triaged |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | sigil-0.7.3-1.fc20 | Doc Type: | Enhancement |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-09-22 23:58:52 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 878188, 915005, 915006, 915920, 915923, 1006254 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Upstream Release Monitoring
2013-02-04 09:45:54 UTC
*** Bug 909936 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 912109 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 917632 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Dan Horák, are you going to take care of doing an update to 0.7.1, or shall I? Also what do you think wrt pushing this version to older Fedoras. I think we should leave F-17 at 0.6.2. but for F-18 I think it would be good to offer 0.7.1 as an update, agreed ? Hi Hans, currently all updates to sigil are blocked by the missing qt5 in Fedora, generally I agree with the update in F-18 to 0.7.x, but all depends on the qt5 ... I'm watching the qt5 review ticket, so I can do the update when it will become available. Dan (In reply to comment #5) > Hi Hans, > > currently all updates to sigil are blocked by the missing qt5 in Fedora, > generally I agree with the update in F-18 to 0.7.x, but all depends on the > qt5 ... Ah, didn't now that, ok! > I'm watching the qt5 review ticket, so I can do the update when it > will become available. Ok, assigning this to you then :) Regards, Hans *** Bug 952203 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 991786 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** sigil-0.7.3-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sigil-0.7.3-1.fc20 Package sigil-0.7.3-1.fc20: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing sigil-0.7.3-1.fc20' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-16449/sigil-0.7.3-1.fc20 then log in and leave karma (feedback). sigil-0.7.3-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Is it possible to push this to Fedora 19 and 18? Qt5 5.1 is already packaged and released for both Fedoras. |