Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 91958

Summary:	RFE: GNU aspell-nl version instead of the current one
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Raw Hide	Reporter:	Peter van Egdom <p.van.egdom>
Component:	aspell-nl	Assignee:	Eido Inoue <havill>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Ben Levenson <benl>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	1.0	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	0.50-3	Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2003-08-01 21:39:34 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	100644

Description Peter van Egdom 2003-05-30 11:00:51 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030509

Description of problem:
The Dutch aspell dictionary as distributed by Red Hat appears not to be the same
as the one that is available on the GNU aspell dictionary list site :

"http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/"


The maintainer of the GNU version of the aspell dictionary has the following to
say about this particular version :

("http://tinf2.vub.ac.be/~dvermeir/software/dv/nl-aspell/index.html")


"The word list has been compiled from a number of sources:

 1. The list used in the aspell-nl-0.1.rpm package. The main reason
    I decided to build the present package is that I could not find
    a tarball distribution of this rpm and that some ``exceptions''
    from the official lists seemed to be missing.

 2. The lists in the official announcement (1996) about spelling
    changes.

 3. The list by Piet Tutelaers available on
    http://www.ntg.nl/spell-nl-v5b/.
"

Would it be a good idea to use the GNU version of aspell-nl instead?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
aspell-nl-0.1-17

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. - Checkout Red Hat Linux 9 or current (30 may 2003) Rawhide.

2. - Checkout GNU Aspell Dictionaries
     (http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/)
  

Actual Results:
1. - See that "aspell-nl-0.1-17" is in Red Hat.

2. - See that "aspell-nl-0.50-2.tar.bz2" exists.

Expected Results:
  Maybe Red Hat should sync with GNU Aspell Dictionaries?

Additional info:

Comment 1 Eido Inoue 2003-08-01 21:39:34 UTC

updated to 0.50 series with the aspell upgrade