Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 919935
Summary: | enblend FTBFS due to doc/texinfo related issues | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Rex Dieter <rdieter> |
Component: | enblend | Assignee: | Bruno Postle <bruno> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 23 | CC: | awilliam, bruno, bruno, jreznik, jspaleta, robatino, rvokal, sebastian |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-11-24 22:32:52 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 921706 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 924248 |
Description
Rex Dieter
2013-03-10 23:41:56 UTC
texinfo 5.1 *may* fix this: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2013-03/msg00007.html "This release is primarily for a couple of compatibility issues discover in 5.0." "Texinfo 5.1 (12 March 2013) * texi2any: . irregular sectioning trees (see 5.0 news item) produce a warning rather than an error. . @set in the middle of the line no longer produces a warning." If someone bumps texinfo to 5.1 we could give it a shot, at least. As it stands this is an F19 Alpha Blocker as it prevents compose of the KDE live image. I invoke the automatic blocker procedure to mark this as an AcceptedBlocker: see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process#Automatic_blockers . The valid types of bug for automatic blocker status include "Bugs which entirely prevent the composition of one or more of the release-blocking images required to be built for a currently-pending (pre-)release", and the KDE image is release-blocking at all milestones. The bug can be rendered not a release blocker by dropping kipi-plugins from the image if we cannot fix the enblend build, but it would be better to fix the build. Tried a hacked-together texinfo-5.1 build, and it still fails similarly. rm -rf $backupdir; exit $rc ./auxmac.texi:9: warning: redefining Texinfo language command: @dmn ./auxmac.texi:119: warning: redefining Texinfo language command: @geq ./auxmac.texi:136: warning: redefining Texinfo language command: @leq enblend.texi:451: bad syntax for @value enblend.texi:451: misplaced { enblend.texi:451: misplaced } enblend.texi:511: warning: @ifinfo should only appear at a line beginning (possibly involving @power) enblend.texi:511: warning: unknown @end docbook-pixel (possibly involving @power) enblend.texi:513: warning: @ifinfo should only appear at a line beginning (possibly involving @classictimes) enblend.texi:513: warning: unknown @end docbookheight (possibly involving @classictimes) enblend.texi:591: bad syntax for @value enblend.texi:592: bad syntax for @value enblend.texi:594: @item outside of table or list enblend.texi:595: @itemx outside of table or list enblend.texi:600: bad syntax for @value enblend.texi:600: misplaced { enblend.texi:600: misplaced } ... I know it's evil, but will try a build that omits texinfo generation for now. Getting closer... https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5122547 make pdf MAKEINFO=/bin/true fig2dev -L pdf photographic-workflow.fig photographic-workflow.pdf Error: /invalidfont in /findfont Operand stack: --nostringval-- Helvetica Execution stack: %interp_exit .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push 1894 1 3 %oparray_pop 1893 1 3 %oparray_pop --nostringval-- 1877 1 3 %oparray_pop 1771 1 3 %oparray_pop --nostringval-- %errorexec_pop .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- 1852 2 4 %oparray_pop Dictionary stack: --dict:1167/1684(ro)(G)-- --dict:0/20(G)-- --dict:113/200(L)-- --dict:36/200(L)-- Current allocation mode is local Last OS error: Not a directory GPL Ghostscript 9.06: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1 We've worked-around the texinfo issue, so I'll remove the depends-on bug for that one. *** Bug 922044 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** (In reply to comment #1) > texinfo 5.1 *may* fix this: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2013-03/msg00007.html > > "This release is primarily for a couple of compatibility issues discover > in 5.0." > > "Texinfo 5.1 (12 March 2013) > * texi2any: > . irregular sectioning trees (see 5.0 news item) produce a warning > rather than an error. > . @set in the middle of the line no longer produces a warning." > > If someone bumps texinfo to 5.1 we could give it a shot, at least. jnovy is trying to rebuild it with 5.1 right now. I already tried, see comment #2 (not that upgrading to texinfo-5.1 is a bad idea...) Hi, it seems that texinfo-5.1 doesn't fix it: http://fpaste.org/tWLT/ So this bug isn't really fixed, but rdieter forced a build through with some of the doc generation disabled: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=401657 so we can probably drop it as a blocker, as we have a build now that is okay for KDE images. Discussed at 2013-03-27 blocker review meeting: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-03-27/f19alpha-blocker-review-3.2013-03-27-16.01.log.txt . Dropped as a blocker per comment #9 - we had an enblend build in TC2 that seems to be okay for image build / install purposes. The underlying texinfo issues aren't fixed though, so not closing. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 19 development cycle. Changing version to '19'. (As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 19 development cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 19 End Of Life. Thank you.) More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora19 I checked again with f20 and f21, reverted the enblend spec to try and build the docs and get exactly the same error as before. So reassigning to rawhide. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 23 development cycle. Changing version to '23'. (As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 23 development cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 23 End Of Life. Thank you.) More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora23 FYI upstream has a fix by now. We apply these two eventual patches for a fix in Gentoo: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/commit/13d95cfe56b912f73214117a4af28560370305a4 The related bug report is https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 Best, S This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 23. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '23'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 23 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. Looks like builds started up again and we have one as recently as April, so closing this. |