Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 92220

Summary:	Attempt to install additional packages from firstboot screen fails
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Linux Beta	Reporter:	Michal Jaegermann <michal>
Component:	redhat-config-packages	Assignee:	Jeremy Katz <katzj>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	alpha 2	CC:	krmaxwell
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2003-10-21 20:00:17 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	100643

Description Michal Jaegermann 2003-06-03 22:20:23 UTC

Description of problem:

The program offers a possibility to install more packages with three
choices of "Documentation", "Install" and "Extra" CDs (or something pretty
close).  When taken on that it whirls for a while, says something about
building dependency trees and returns to the same screen without giving
any choices.  I tried with installation CDs and punching both
"Installation" and "Extra" buttons. Results were the same.  Presumably
this is not an intended outcome.

Comment 1 Brent Fox 2003-06-04 00:23:49 UTC

comps.py is in flux right now while modify it to handle multiple arches.  Until
that is finished, the package tool will probably not work except for installing
packages that have no dependencies.

Comment 2 Brent Fox 2003-07-14 20:31:05 UTC

Changing to redhat-config-packages since that is the correct component.

Comment 3 Jeremy Katz 2003-07-27 03:20:09 UTC

*** Bug 100860 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Jeremy Katz 2003-10-21 20:00:17 UTC

This should be happier now.