Description
Peter Robinson
2013-03-15 21:11:35 UTC
FWIW the mass-filed "foo: Does not support aarch64" bugs to update config.{guess.sub} in individual packages could/should be closed now, as this is done automatically from %configure macro now (see bug 951442) (In reply to comment #1) > FWIW the mass-filed "foo: Does not support aarch64" bugs to update > config.{guess.sub} in individual packages could/should be closed now, as > this is done automatically from %configure macro now (see bug 951442) Seconded. But, Jon Masters [1] correctly pointed out that the %configure is not present in all packages relevant to this tracker - there is also needed to update status for bugs which do not use %configure somehow. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951442#c14 as pointed out in this thread : https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-June/184098.html The better solution is: * Added: BuildRequires: autoconf, automake, libtool, pkgconfig * In "%prep" added: autoreconf --install --force ( from https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-June/184111.html ) (In reply to Pavel Raiskup from comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > FWIW the mass-filed "foo: Does not support aarch64" bugs to update > > config.{guess.sub} in individual packages could/should be closed now, as > > this is done automatically from %configure macro now (see bug 951442) > > Seconded. But, Jon Masters [1] correctly pointed out that the %configure is > not > present in all packages relevant to this tracker - there is also needed to > update status for bugs which do not use %configure somehow. > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951442#c14 So when will the wrongly opened bugs be closed? Adding Tracking, FutureFeature keywords to avoid rawhide rebase. *** Bug 978473 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Should be linked against ARMTracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245418 or F-ExcludeArch-ARM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485251 |