Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
|Summary:||ardour: Does not support aarch64 in f19 and rawhide|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Dennis Gilmore <dennis>|
|Component:||ardour||Assignee:||Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora>|
|Status:||CLOSED ERRATA||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||rawhide||CC:||hdegoede, nphilipp, oget.fedora|
|Fixed In Version:||ardour-2.8.16-3.fc19||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2013-05-24 20:48:08 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Dennis Gilmore 2013-03-23 00:02:41 UTC
Support for the ARM 64 bit CPU architecture (aarch64) was introduced in autoconf 2.69. ardour appears to use an earlier version of autoconf, preventing its being built. This can be fixed in of three ways (In order of preference): 1. Work with upstream to migrate the package to autoconf 2.69. 2. Rerun autoconf or autoreconf in %prep or %build prior to running configure. 3. Apply the patch at http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/aarch64/ardour/ardour-aarch64.patch which updates config.guess and config.sub to recognize aarch64.
Comment 1 Orcan Ogetbil 2013-03-23 00:44:24 UTC
Hi, just out of curiousity, what kind of ARM machine, do you think, would provide a use case to run ardour?
Comment 2 Hans de Goede 2013-03-23 10:11:18 UTC
Hi, (In reply to comment #1) > Hi, just out of curiousity, what kind of ARM machine, do you think, would > provide a use case to run ardour? TBH that does not really matter, in Fedora we simply want all packages to build on all atchs. Even so the new A15 based Samsung chromebooks should be more then capable of running ardour and certainly future 64 bit arm machines will be capable too. Regards, Hans
Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2013-05-10 15:15:29 UTC
ardour-2.8.16-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ardour-2.8.16-3.fc19
Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2013-05-11 02:36:37 UTC
Package ardour-2.8.16-3.fc19: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing ardour-2.8.16-3.fc19' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-7888/ardour-2.8.16-3.fc19 then log in and leave karma (feedback).
Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2013-05-24 20:48:08 UTC
ardour-2.8.16-3.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.