Summary: | elfutils: tests fail on F-21 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dennis Gilmore <dennis> |
Component: | elfutils | Assignee: | Roland McGrath <roland> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fche, mjw, mjw, pbrobinson, pmachata, roland |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | elfutils-0.158-1.fc21 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-01-14 18:06:33 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 922257 |
Description
Dennis Gilmore
2013-03-23 00:23:19 UTC
We can certainly run autoreconf to pick up the latest autoconf. That will give you an elfutils that can be used for the architectures it already supports. But elfutils doesn't have an ARM64 backend at the moment. Is anybody planning on writing one? Alternatively could someone attach some ARM64 ELF object that we can use as testcase for writing one? (In reply to comment #1) > Is anybody planning on writing one? Not that I know of. We should sync with Linaro on that not to duplicate effort. I'd be interested in working on it. Petr now has a branch with initial support, not yet integrated into mainline: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/elfutils.git/log/?h=pmachata/aarch64 The aarch64 support (sans unwinding) is now upstream. So elfutils builds but some of the tests fail on elfutils-0.157-2.fc21 A sample of the errors are below but a full build log can be found here (any of the fc21 builds) http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1626 ============================================================================ Testsuite summary for elfutils 0.157 ============================================================================ # TOTAL: 101 # PASS: 98 # SKIP: 0 # XFAIL: 0 # FAIL: 3 # XPASS: 0 # ERROR: 0 ============================================================================ See tests/test-suite.log Please report to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ ============================================================================ make[3]: *** [test-suite.log] Error 1 make[2]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 2 make[1]: *** [check-am] Error 2 make: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 + cat tests/test-suite.log ========================================== elfutils 0.157: tests/test-suite.log ========================================== # TOTAL: 101 # PASS: 98 # SKIP: 0 # XFAIL: 0 # FAIL: 3 # XPASS: 0 # ERROR: 0 .. contents:: :depth: 2 FAIL: run-strip-reloc.sh ======================== *** failure --reloc-debug-sections not smaller /builddir/build/BUILD/elfutils-0.157/src/strip.o FAIL: run-elflint-self.sh ========================= unknown machine type 183 section [ 9] '.rela.dyn': relocation 0: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.dyn': relocation 1: invalid type section [ 9] '.rela.dyn': relocation 2: invalid type section [10] '.rela.plt': relocation 0: invalid type section [10] '.rela.plt': relocation 1: invalid type section [10] '.rela.plt': relocation 2: invalid type section [10] '.rela.plt': relocation 3: invalid type (In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #5) > So elfutils builds but some of the tests fail on elfutils-0.157-2.fc21 > > A sample of the errors are below but a full build log can be found here (any > of the fc21 builds) > > http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1626 Sorry, but what are you precisely testing here? Did you backport the upstream git patches for aarch64 support to the elfutils-0.157-2.fc21 package? (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #6) > (In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #5) > > So elfutils builds but some of the tests fail on elfutils-0.157-2.fc21 > > > > A sample of the errors are below but a full build log can be found here (any > > of the fc21 builds) > > > > http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1626 > > Sorry, but what are you precisely testing here? > Did you backport the upstream git patches for aarch64 support to the > elfutils-0.157-2.fc21 package? Nope, it's the mainline Fedora package with the same NVR, what else would I be testing? (In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #7) > (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #6) > > (In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #5) > > > So elfutils builds but some of the tests fail on elfutils-0.157-2.fc21 > > > > > > A sample of the errors are below but a full build log can be found here (any > > > of the fc21 builds) > > > > > > http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1626 > > > > Sorry, but what are you precisely testing here? > > Did you backport the upstream git patches for aarch64 support to the > > elfutils-0.157-2.fc21 package? > > Nope, it's the mainline Fedora package with the same NVR, what else would I > be testing? OK. Then just wait for the 0.158 upstream release. Should be out in ~2 weeks. Note that the aarch64 support depends on the following binutils fix: http://cygwin.com/ml/binutils/2013-07/msg00013.html Does anybody know whether that is already in fc21? > > Nope, it's the mainline Fedora package with the same NVR, what else would I > > be testing? > > OK. Then just wait for the 0.158 upstream release. Should be out in ~2 weeks. OK, will keep an eye out for it > Note that the aarch64 support depends on the following binutils fix: > > http://cygwin.com/ml/binutils/2013-07/msg00013.html > > Does anybody know whether that is already in fc21? Yes, looking at the tarball it looks like the patch is there Seems OK now so will close |