Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 926075
Summary: | lingot: Does not support aarch64 in f19 and rawhide | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dennis Gilmore <dennis> |
Component: | lingot | Assignee: | Karel Volný <kvolny> |
Status: | CLOSED UPSTREAM | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | dennis, kvolny, sanjay.ankur |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-01-31 16:36:24 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 922257 |
Description
Dennis Gilmore
2013-03-23 15:24:12 UTC
Cannot be built due to this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938 Pushed to SCM. Will push a build as soon as the bug is fixed. Ankur ping, if I recall correctly, ARM support has been somehow hacked at buildsys level, is this bug still relevant? the next upstream version is going to use 2.69 - at least http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/lingot/file/7ed4f5d21d15/configure says # Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.69. ... but I can't guess when it will be released would that be okay to switch this to closed/upstream? (In reply to Karel Volný from comment #2) > ping, if I recall correctly, ARM support has been somehow hacked at buildsys > level, is this bug still relevant? ah, I could answer my own question by reading bug #922257 #c1 so, this is no longer an issue |