Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
|Summary:||maxima: Does not support aarch64 in f19 and rawhide|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Dennis Gilmore <dennis>|
|Component:||maxima||Assignee:||Rex Dieter <rdieter>|
|Status:||CLOSED NEXTRELEASE||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||rawhide||CC:||jamatos, mjuszkie, rdieter|
|Fixed In Version:||15.08.2-1.fc23||Doc Type:||Enhancement|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2015-09-24 05:12:59 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Dennis Gilmore 2013-03-23 15:27:03 UTC
Support for the ARM 64 bit CPU architecture (aarch64) was introduced in autoconf 2.69. maxima appears to use an earlier version of autoconf, preventing its being built. This can be fixed in of three ways (In order of preference): 1. Work with upstream to migrate the package to autoconf 2.69. 2. Rerun autoconf or autoreconf in %prep or %build prior to running configure. 3. Apply the patch at http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/aarch64/maxima/maxima-aarch64.patch which updates config.guess and config.sub to recognize aarch64.
Comment 1 Marcin Juszkiewicz 2014-10-03 10:26:51 UTC
Comment 2 Jan Kurik 2015-07-15 14:49:20 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 23 development cycle. Changing version to '23'. (As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 23 development cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 23 End Of Life. Thank you.) More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora23
Comment 3 Rex Dieter 2015-09-14 14:37:57 UTC
Not sbcl specifically, but any lisp compiler, of those maxima currently supports, looks like only gcl supports aarch64 at the moment. I'll add it.
Comment 4 Rex Dieter 2015-09-14 14:40:07 UTC
Oh, and ecl is doable too
Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2015-09-15 06:36:15 UTC
wxMaxima-15.08.2-1.fc23 maxima-5.37.1-2.fc23 sbcl-1.2.15-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15868
Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2015-09-15 16:50:36 UTC
maxima-5.37.1-2.fc23, sbcl-1.2.15-1.fc23, wxMaxima-15.08.2-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sbcl maxima wxMaxima'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15868
Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2015-09-24 05:12:48 UTC
maxima-5.37.1-2.fc23, sbcl-1.2.15-1.fc23, wxMaxima-15.08.2-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.