Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 991666
Summary: | Review Request: compat-lua - Powerful light-weight programming language (compat version) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Hans de Goede <hdegoede> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Christopher Meng <i> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | i, moceap, notting, package-review |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | i:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-08-05 13:46:56 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 991874, 991903, 991924 |
Description
Hans de Goede
2013-08-03 12:36:13 UTC
Why not shipping static files this time? And why the release is 5 comparing with this: http://pkgs.org/fedora-rawhide/fedora-i386/compat-lua-libs-5.1.4-1.fc20.i686.rpm.html And can you help notify Tom that the changelog of the above package is wrong? (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1) > Why not shipping static files this time? Because we've a policy in Fedora to avoid static libs whenever possible, and there does not seem to be a need for having a compat-lua-static. If such a need ever comes up, with convincing arguments, they can be added. > > And why the release is 5 comparing with this: > > http://pkgs.org/fedora-rawhide/fedora-i386/compat-lua-libs-5.1.4-1.fc20.i686. > rpm.html Because it needs to be bigger then the release used there, and I wanted some extra room in case there were some iterations of compat-lua-libs before compat-lua enters the distro as a separate package. > And can you help notify Tom that the changelog of the above package is wrong? Anyone can notify Tom, either through his public email address, or through bugzilla. But if you can tell me what is wrong, I can fix it when I remove compat-lua-libs from the main lua package. Package is fine. APPROVED. (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #4) > Package is fine. Thanks for the review! New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: compat-lua Short Description: Powerful light-weight programming language (compat version) Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). Thanks!, Imported and build, closing. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: compat-lua New Branches: el6 epel7 Owners: jwrdegoede moceap Git done (by process-git-requests). compat-lua-5.1.5-3.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/compat-lua-5.1.5-3.el7 |