Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 991753
| Summary: | Review Request: mph-2b-damase-fonts - Free font encoding many non-Latin scripts | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Parag Nemade <pnemade> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Christopher Meng <i> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | gwync, i, notting, package-review, psatpute |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | i:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | mph-2b-damase-fonts-002.000-3.el7 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-08-15 02:35:30 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Parag Nemade
2013-08-04 09:39:21 UTC
OH? Is it OK to leave the %prep blank? Are you sure it's licensed under PD? yes its OK to leave %prep blank. It depends on how the source archive is? zip, tar extracting either with %{name}-%{version} or %{name} or just without creating any directory.
AFAICS, In font info its written "Public Domain 2005". also some of the references that said its Public Domain are
1) http://www.ffonts.net/MPH-2B-Damase.font
2) http://www.fontspace.com/mark-williamson/mph-2b-damase
3) http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=306290 ( I have not read this whole bugzilla) <- you can see the font Author was available there.
OK. Since no %doc available, you can drop it in SCM. APPROVED. Thanks for the quick review. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: mph-2b-damase-fonts Short Description: Free font encoding many non-Latin scripts Owners: pnemade Branches: f19 f18 InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: mph-2b-damase-fonts InitialCC: fonts-sig i18n-team mph-2b-damase-fonts-002.000-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mph-2b-damase-fonts-002.000-2.fc18 mph-2b-damase-fonts-002.000-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mph-2b-damase-fonts-002.000-2.fc19 Misformatted request. May I know what is misformatted? Its clearly written "The Package Name field is mandatory. Please only include other fields which need to be changed or updated." on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests I misunderstood the request. This has been done, though there is no i18n-team virtual user. mph-2b-damase-fonts-002.000-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository. As long as my eyes are not seeing above request as wrong, I see i18n-team is a valid virtual user. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests#Pseudo-users_for_SIGs also, I don't understand howcome SCM request got completed without an error for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991724#c4 See these messages that I got limb approved watchbugzilla on trabajo-fonts (Fedora devel) for fonts-sig limb approved watchcommits on trabajo-fonts (Fedora devel) for fonts-sig limb approved watchbugzilla on trabajo-fonts (Fedora devel) for i18n-team limb approved watchcommits on trabajo-fonts (Fedora devel) for i18n-team Odd, now it worked. Sorry for the confusion. mph-2b-damase-fonts-002.000-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. mph-2b-damase-fonts-002.000-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. This package description is not very clear. From description it looks like font encoding rather than fonts itself. Proper description or short description may be.. "Mark Williamson's MPH 2B Damase is a free font for many non-Latin scripts encoding." Please fix it. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: mph-2b-damase-fonts New Branches: el5 el6 epel7 Owners: pnemade Git done (by process-git-requests). mph-2b-damase-fonts-002.000-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mph-2b-damase-fonts-002.000-3.el6 mph-2b-damase-fonts-002.000-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mph-2b-damase-fonts-002.000-3.el5 mph-2b-damase-fonts-002.000-3.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mph-2b-damase-fonts-002.000-3.el7 mph-2b-damase-fonts-002.000-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. mph-2b-damase-fonts-002.000-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. mph-2b-damase-fonts-002.000-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. |