Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 991927

Summary:	389-admin: FTBFS in rawhide
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Dennis Gilmore <dennis>
Component:	389-admin	Assignee:	Rich Megginson <rmeggins>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	awilliam, mreynolds, nhosoi, nkinder, ppisar, rmeggins
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	389-admin-1.1.35-1.fc18	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-08-20 20:53:54 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	991858

Description Dennis Gilmore 2013-08-05 02:57:49 UTC

Your package 389-admin failed to build from source in current rawhide.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5694267

Build logs:
root.log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/4267/5694267/root.log
build.log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/4267/5694267/build.log
state.log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/4267/5694267/state.log
NOTE: build logs are cleaned up after 1 week

For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild

Comment 1 Petr Pisar 2013-08-06 10:51:45 UTC

configure: checking for ADMINUTIL...
checking for --with-adminutil... no
checking for adminutil with pkg-config... checking for pkg-config... (cached) /usr/bin/i686-redhat-linux-gnu-pkg-config
configure: error: ADMINUTIL not found, specify with --with-adminutil.

Missing a dependency?

Comment 2 Adam Williamson 2013-08-06 21:14:55 UTC

I don't think it's a missing dependency, the package has:

BuildRequires:    389-adminutil-devel

I note, though, that the pkgconfig file is /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/389-adminutil.pc - perhaps the library's pkgconfig name changed and 389-admin's build scripts weren't adjusted?

Comment 3 Rich Megginson 2013-08-06 21:21:01 UTC

(In reply to Adam Williamson from comment #2)
> I don't think it's a missing dependency, the package has:
> 
> BuildRequires:    389-adminutil-devel
> 
> I note, though, that the pkgconfig file is
> /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/389-adminutil.pc - perhaps the library's pkgconfig name
> changed and 389-admin's build scripts weren't adjusted?

It's been this way since . . . F-14?  And now all of a sudden in F-20 it stops working?

Comment 4 Adam Williamson 2013-08-06 21:41:40 UTC

See comments #5 and #6 on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991928 . I did as much digging into this as I could manage. Hope it helps.

Comment 5 Rich Megginson 2013-08-07 20:58:38 UTC

Upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47465

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2013-08-20 19:51:50 UTC

389-admin-1.1.35-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-1.1.35-1.fc19

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2013-08-20 19:52:23 UTC

389-admin-1.1.35-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-1.1.35-1.fc18

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2013-09-30 00:36:33 UTC

389-admin-1.1.35-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2014-01-14 08:40:21 UTC

389-admin-1.1.35-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.