Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1098220 - New upstream release available
Summary: New upstream release available
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: goobook
Version: 22
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Sven Lankes
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1284440
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-05-15 13:50 UTC by Adam Huffman
Modified: 2023-09-12 00:30 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: goobook-1.9-2.fc23
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-02-05 21:22:07 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
update gobook to 1.9 (2.23 KB, patch)
2015-12-22 13:08 UTC, Evgeni Golov 		no flags Details | Diff
View All

Description Adam Huffman 2014-05-15 13:50:50 UTC 
Description of problem:

Please update to upstream release 1.5 - thanks.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 Jaroslav Reznik 2015-03-03 15:48:51 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle.
Changing version to '22'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22
Comment 2 Andrew J. Schorr 2015-06-28 14:50:28 UTC 
I'm not sure about the Fedora versioning issues, but the current goobook release is now 1.9.  Fedora seems to be stuck at 1.3, which no longer works. Is anybody maintaining this package?  An upgrade to 1.9 would be really nice.

Thanks,
Andy
Comment 3 Paul W. Frields 2015-08-18 21:10:35 UTC 
Howard -- please respond, are you maintaining this package still?
Comment 4 Evgeni Golov 2015-12-22 13:08:11 UTC 
Hi,

attached is a patch against pkgs git master to update goobook to 1.9.

I'd be willing to help maintaining gobook in Fedora.

Greets
Evgeni
Comment 5 Evgeni Golov 2015-12-22 13:08:38 UTC 
Created attachment 1108636 [details]
update gobook to 1.9
Comment 6 Evgeni Golov 2015-12-22 13:24:38 UTC 
copr: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/evgeni/goobook/
Comment 7 Evgeni Golov 2016-01-03 20:10:59 UTC 
ping, any update on this?
Comment 8 Sven Lankes 2016-01-04 20:40:22 UTC 
I've already started the non-responsive-maintainer process by posting to fedora-devel.

Howard, to follow the procedure, I'm asking you to please either update the package or orphan the package.
Comment 9 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2016-01-25 16:21:30 UTC 
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Comment 10 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2016-01-25 16:42:18 UTC 
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2016-01-27 08:29:10 UTC 
goobook-1.9-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a2e2ce021a
Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2016-01-28 22:26:55 UTC 
goobook-1.9-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a2e2ce021a
Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2016-02-05 21:22:01 UTC 
goobook-1.9-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Comment 14 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-12 00:30:50 UTC 
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.