Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1107273 - sblim-cim-client: FTBFS in rawhide
Summary: sblim-cim-client: FTBFS in rawhide
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: sblim-cim-client
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Vitezslav Crhonek
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F21FTBFS
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-06-09 21:04 UTC by Dennis Gilmore
Modified: 2014-06-16 11:00 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: sblim-cim-client-1.3.9.3-8.fc21
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-06-16 11:00:21 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
build.log (50.28 KB, text/plain)
2014-06-09 21:04 UTC, Dennis Gilmore 		no flags Details
root.log (94.47 KB, text/plain)
2014-06-09 21:04 UTC, Dennis Gilmore 		no flags Details
state.log (1.11 KB, text/plain)
2014-06-09 21:04 UTC, Dennis Gilmore 		no flags Details
View All

Description Dennis Gilmore 2014-06-09 21:04:06 UTC 
Your package sblim-cim-client failed to build from source in current rawhide.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7004862

For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild
Comment 1 Dennis Gilmore 2014-06-09 21:04:10 UTC 
Created attachment 906539 [details]
build.log
Comment 2 Dennis Gilmore 2014-06-09 21:04:13 UTC 
Created attachment 906540 [details]
root.log
Comment 3 Dennis Gilmore 2014-06-09 21:04:14 UTC 
Created attachment 906541 [details]
state.log
Comment 4 Vitezslav Crhonek 2014-06-10 10:16:17 UTC 
Seems to be an issue with java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel. Builds fine with java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1:1.7.0.60-2.4.7.4.fc20, fails with java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1:1.7.0.60-2.5.0.22.pre04.fc21:

  [javadoc] java.lang.IllegalStateException: endPosTable already set
  [javadoc] 	at com.sun.tools.javac.util.DiagnosticSource.setEndPosTable(DiagnosticSource.java:136)
  [javadoc] 	at com.sun.tools.javac.util.Log.setEndPosTable(Log.java:350)
  [javadoc] 	at com.sun.tools.javac.main.JavaCompiler.parse(JavaCompiler.java:670)
  [javadoc] 	at com.sun.tools.javadoc.JavadocTool.parsePackageClasses(JavadocTool.java:243)
  [javadoc] 	at com.sun.tools.javadoc.JavadocTool.getRootDocImpl(JavadocTool.java:180)
  [javadoc] 	at com.sun.tools.javadoc.Start.parseAndExecute(Start.java:346)
  [javadoc] 	at com.sun.tools.javadoc.Start.begin(Start.java:219)
  [javadoc] 	at com.sun.tools.javadoc.Start.begin(Start.java:205)
  [javadoc] 	at com.sun.tools.javadoc.Main.execute(Main.java:64)
  [javadoc] 	at com.sun.tools.javadoc.Main.main(Main.java:54)
  [javadoc] javadoc: error - fatal exception

Adding java-1.7.0-openjdk maintainers to CC, maybe they could help somehow.
Comment 5 Omair Majid 2014-06-10 13:46:22 UTC 
Thanks for CC'ing me.

(In reply to Vitezslav Crhonek from comment #4)
> java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1:1.7.0.60-2.5.0.22.pre04.fc21:

I have a suspicion this is being built using java-1.8.0-openjdk instead. Can you confirm/deny this?

I see a fix upstream for this: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/4c09a8dd09b3. Let me see what I can do.
Comment 6 Vitezslav Crhonek 2014-06-11 09:50:05 UTC 
(In reply to Omair Majid from comment #5)
> Thanks for CC'ing me.
> 
> (In reply to Vitezslav Crhonek from comment #4)
> > java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1:1.7.0.60-2.5.0.22.pre04.fc21:
> 
> I have a suspicion this is being built using java-1.8.0-openjdk instead. Can
> you confirm/deny this?
> 

Hello Omair,

I see both java-1.7.0 and java-1.8.0 installed in build root (is that OK?), but I'm not able to read from logs which is actually used.

The sblim-cim-client pacakage build requires just this:
BuildRequires:  java-devel >= 1.4

Many thanks for investigating it!
Comment 7 Omair Majid 2014-06-11 17:46:22 UTC 
(In reply to Vitezslav Crhonek from comment #6)
> I see both java-1.7.0 and java-1.8.0 installed in build root (is that OK?),

Yes, it's okay. But only one will be used by default. Currently, that's java-1.8.0-openjdk.

> but I'm not able to read from logs which is actually used.

I am not familiar with the build. Can you instrument it to print that out? I don't see any instructions to use a specific Java version in the build.xml file, so my assumption is that it's using java-1.8.0-openjdk (the defualt).
Comment 8 Omair Majid 2014-06-11 19:41:48 UTC 
Never mind.

This is a bug in java-1.8.0-openjdk. The upstream fix is: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/6acecb34d1bc

I will add it to the java-1.8.0-openjdk RPM for now.
Comment 9 Omair Majid 2014-06-13 02:05:41 UTC 
I have built a fixed java-1.8.0-openjdk in rawhide. Can you please rebuild this package? It should work now.
Comment 10 Vitezslav Crhonek 2014-06-16 11:00:21 UTC 
Thanks, worked fine!
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.