Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1320878 - Review Request: libjson-rpc-cpp - C++ framework for json-rpc (json remote procedure call)
Summary: Review Request: libjson-rpc-cpp - C++ framework for json-rpc (json remote pro...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Vitaly
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: catch 1320876
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-03-24 09:11 UTC by Igor Gnatenko
Modified: 2017-02-07 00:53 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-02-07 00:22:34 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
vitaly: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Igor Gnatenko 2016-03-24 09:11:16 UTC
Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/libjson-rpc-cpp.spec
SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/libjson-rpc-cpp-0.6.0-1.fc25.src.rpm
Description:
Framework for JSON remote procedure call.

Features of this framework include:

* Type checking
* Malformed request handling
* Handling batch procedure calls
* JSON-RPC Method invocation
* JSON-RPC Notification invocation
* Simple Interface for implementing additional Server-Connectors beside HTTP
* Positional and named parameters

Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain

Comment 1 Igor Gnatenko 2016-04-02 14:32:43 UTC
New SRPM: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/libjson-rpc-cpp-0.6.0-2.fc24.src.rpm

Now it's using already packaged version of catch from Tom Hughes.

Comment 2 Vitaly 2017-01-05 16:31:03 UTC
I will review this package.

Comment 4 Vitaly 2017-01-07 12:42:59 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
  are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
  Note: These BR are not needed: make gcc-c++
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2


===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[ ]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.

Generic:
[ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 160 files have
     unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/vitaly/1320878-libjson-rpc-cpp/licensecheck.txt
[ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[ ]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[ ]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in libjson-
     rpc-cpp-devel , libjson-rpc-cpp-common , libjson-rpc-cpp-client ,
     libjson-rpc-cpp-server , libjson-rpc-cpp-stub , libjson-rpc-cpp-tools
     , libjson-rpc-cpp-debuginfo
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[ ]: Latest version is packaged.
[ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[ ]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
     justified.
[ ]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[ ]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: libjson-rpc-cpp-devel-0.7.0-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm
          libjson-rpc-cpp-common-0.7.0-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm
          libjson-rpc-cpp-client-0.7.0-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm
          libjson-rpc-cpp-server-0.7.0-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm
          libjson-rpc-cpp-stub-0.7.0-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm
          libjson-rpc-cpp-tools-0.7.0-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm
          libjson-rpc-cpp-debuginfo-0.7.0-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm
          libjson-rpc-cpp-0.7.0-1.fc26.src.rpm
libjson-rpc-cpp-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on libjson-rpc-cpp/libjson-rpc-cpp-libs/liblibjson-rpc-cpp
libjson-rpc-cpp-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
libjson-rpc-cpp-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
libjson-rpc-cpp-client.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) json -> son, j son
libjson-rpc-cpp-client.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libcurl -> lib curl, lib-curl, curlicue
libjson-rpc-cpp-client.x86_64: W: no-documentation
libjson-rpc-cpp-server.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) json -> son, j son
libjson-rpc-cpp-server.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libmicrohttpd -> microlight
libjson-rpc-cpp-server.x86_64: W: no-documentation
libjson-rpc-cpp-stub.x86_64: W: no-documentation
libjson-rpc-cpp-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/libjson-rpc-cpp-0.7.0/src/stubgenerator/server/cppserverstubgenerator.cpp
libjson-rpc-cpp-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/libjson-rpc-cpp-0.7.0/src/stubgenerator/helper/cpphelper.cpp
libjson-rpc-cpp-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/libjson-rpc-cpp-0.7.0/src/stubgenerator/client/cppclientstubgenerator.cpp
libjson-rpc-cpp.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) json -> son, j son
libjson-rpc-cpp.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US json -> son, j son
libjson-rpc-cpp.src: E: description-line-too-long C C++ framework for json-rpc (json remote procedure call). This package is meta-package which requires:
8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 15 warnings.




Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: libjson-rpc-cpp-debuginfo-0.7.0-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm
libjson-rpc-cpp-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/libjson-rpc-cpp-0.7.0/src/stubgenerator/client/cppclientstubgenerator.cpp
libjson-rpc-cpp-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/libjson-rpc-cpp-0.7.0/src/stubgenerator/server/cppserverstubgenerator.cpp
libjson-rpc-cpp-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/libjson-rpc-cpp-0.7.0/src/stubgenerator/helper/cpphelper.cpp
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.





Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory
libjson-rpc-cpp-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/libjson-rpc-cpp-0.7.0/src/stubgenerator/client/cppclientstubgenerator.cpp
libjson-rpc-cpp-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/libjson-rpc-cpp-0.7.0/src/stubgenerator/helper/cpphelper.cpp
libjson-rpc-cpp-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/libjson-rpc-cpp-0.7.0/src/stubgenerator/server/cppserverstubgenerator.cpp
libjson-rpc-cpp-server.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) json -> son, j son
libjson-rpc-cpp-server.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libmicrohttpd -> microlight
libjson-rpc-cpp-server.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libjsonrpccpp-server.so.0.7.0 /lib64/libm.so.6
libjson-rpc-cpp-server.x86_64: W: no-documentation
libjson-rpc-cpp-client.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) json -> son, j son
libjson-rpc-cpp-client.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libcurl -> lib curl, lib-curl, curlicue
libjson-rpc-cpp-client.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libjsonrpccpp-client.so.0.7.0 /lib64/libm.so.6
libjson-rpc-cpp-client.x86_64: W: no-documentation
libjson-rpc-cpp-common.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libjsonrpccpp-common.so.0.7.0 /lib64/libm.so.6
libjson-rpc-cpp-stub.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libjsonrpccpp-stub.so.0.7.0 /lib64/libjsoncpp.so.11
libjson-rpc-cpp-stub.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libjsonrpccpp-stub.so.0.7.0 /lib64/libm.so.6
libjson-rpc-cpp-stub.x86_64: W: no-documentation
libjson-rpc-cpp-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on libjson-rpc-cpp/libjson-rpc-cpp-libs/liblibjson-rpc-cpp
libjson-rpc-cpp-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
libjson-rpc-cpp-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 18 warnings.



Requires
--------
libjson-rpc-cpp-tools (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libargtable2.so.0()(64bit)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
    libjson-rpc-cpp-common(x86-64)
    libjsoncpp.so.11()(64bit)
    libjsonrpccpp-common.so.0()(64bit)
    libjsonrpccpp-stub.so.0()(64bit)
    libm.so.6()(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

libjson-rpc-cpp-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

libjson-rpc-cpp-server (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /sbin/ldconfig
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
    libjson-rpc-cpp-common(x86-64)
    libjsoncpp.so.11()(64bit)
    libjsonrpccpp-common.so.0()(64bit)
    libm.so.6()(64bit)
    libmicrohttpd.so.12()(64bit)
    libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

libjson-rpc-cpp-client (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /sbin/ldconfig
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libcurl.so.4()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
    libjson-rpc-cpp-common(x86-64)
    libjsoncpp.so.11()(64bit)
    libjsonrpccpp-common.so.0()(64bit)
    libm.so.6()(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

libjson-rpc-cpp-common (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /sbin/ldconfig
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
    libjsoncpp.so.11()(64bit)
    libm.so.6()(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

libjson-rpc-cpp-stub (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /sbin/ldconfig
    libargtable2.so.0()(64bit)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
    libjson-rpc-cpp-common(x86-64)
    libjsoncpp.so.11()(64bit)
    libjsonrpccpp-common.so.0()(64bit)
    libm.so.6()(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

libjson-rpc-cpp-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/pkg-config
    jsoncpp-devel(x86-64)
    libjson-rpc-cpp-client(x86-64)
    libjson-rpc-cpp-common(x86-64)
    libjson-rpc-cpp-server(x86-64)
    libjson-rpc-cpp-stub(x86-64)
    libjsonrpccpp-client.so.0()(64bit)
    libjsonrpccpp-common.so.0()(64bit)
    libjsonrpccpp-server.so.0()(64bit)
    libjsonrpccpp-stub.so.0()(64bit)
    libmicrohttpd-devel(x86-64)



Provides
--------
libjson-rpc-cpp-tools:
    libjson-rpc-cpp-tools
    libjson-rpc-cpp-tools(x86-64)

libjson-rpc-cpp-debuginfo:
    libjson-rpc-cpp-debuginfo
    libjson-rpc-cpp-debuginfo(x86-64)

libjson-rpc-cpp-server:
    libjson-rpc-cpp-server
    libjson-rpc-cpp-server(x86-64)
    libjsonrpccpp-server.so.0()(64bit)

libjson-rpc-cpp-client:
    libjson-rpc-cpp-client
    libjson-rpc-cpp-client(x86-64)
    libjsonrpccpp-client.so.0()(64bit)

libjson-rpc-cpp-common:
    libjson-rpc-cpp-common
    libjson-rpc-cpp-common(x86-64)
    libjsonrpccpp-common.so.0()(64bit)

libjson-rpc-cpp-stub:
    libjson-rpc-cpp-stub
    libjson-rpc-cpp-stub(x86-64)
    libjsonrpccpp-stub.so.0()(64bit)

libjson-rpc-cpp-devel:
    libjson-rpc-cpp-devel
    libjson-rpc-cpp-devel(x86-64)
    pkgconfig(libjsonrpccpp-client)
    pkgconfig(libjsonrpccpp-common)
    pkgconfig(libjsonrpccpp-server)
    pkgconfig(libjsonrpccpp-stub)



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/cinemast/libjson-rpc-cpp/archive/v0.7.0/libjson-rpc-cpp-0.7.0.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 669c2259909f11a8c196923a910f9a16a8225ecc14e6c30e2bcb712bab9097eb
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 669c2259909f11a8c196923a910f9a16a8225ecc14e6c30e2bcb712bab9097eb


Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1320878 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++
Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP
Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6

Comment 5 Vitaly 2017-01-07 12:52:22 UTC
Manual checks:

===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules.

OK.

[ ]: Package contains no static executables.

OK.

Generic:
[ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.

OK.

[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 160 files have
     unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/vitaly/1320878-libjson-rpc-cpp/licensecheck.txt

OK.

[ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.

OK.

[ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.

OK.

[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.

OK.

[ ]: Changelog in prescribed format.

OK.

[ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.

OK.

[ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.

OK.

[ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package

OK.

[ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.

OK.

[ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).

OK.

[ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.

OK.

[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.

OK.

[ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.

OK.

[ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.

OK.

[ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.

OK.

[ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.

OK.

[ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.

OK.

[ ]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.

OK.

[ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.

OK.

[ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.

OK.

[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines

OK.

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.

OK.

[ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).

OK.

[ ]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in libjson-
     rpc-cpp-devel , libjson-rpc-cpp-common , libjson-rpc-cpp-client ,
     libjson-rpc-cpp-server , libjson-rpc-cpp-stub , libjson-rpc-cpp-tools
     , libjson-rpc-cpp-debuginfo

Requires -common. OK.

[ ]: Package functions as described.

OK.

[ ]: Latest version is packaged.

OK.

[ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.

OK.

[ ]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
     justified.

OK.

[ ]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.

OK.

[ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.

Not required.

[ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.

OK.

[ ]: %check is present and all tests pass.

OK. Pass.

[ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.

OK.

Comment 6 Vitaly 2017-01-07 12:54:39 UTC
I think rpmlint warnings can be fixed during package import.

Comment 7 Gwyn Ciesla 2017-01-12 18:19:27 UTC
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/libjson-rpc-cpp

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2017-01-23 16:03:14 UTC
libjson-rpc-cpp-0.7.0-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e4b83d803d

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2017-01-23 16:03:23 UTC
libjson-rpc-cpp-0.7.0-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e61a7d315a

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2017-01-25 01:21:58 UTC
libjson-rpc-cpp-0.7.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e61a7d315a

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2017-01-28 19:18:35 UTC
libjson-rpc-cpp-0.7.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e4b83d803d

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2017-02-07 00:22:34 UTC
libjson-rpc-cpp-0.7.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2017-02-07 00:53:02 UTC
libjson-rpc-cpp-0.7.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.