Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1382071 - [SuperLUMT] use bundled CBLAS on s390x instead of openblas
Summary: [SuperLUMT] use bundled CBLAS on s390x instead of openblas
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: SuperLUMT
Version: rawhide
Hardware: s390x
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Antonio T. (sagitter)
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: ZedoraTracker
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-10-05 16:28 UTC by Dan Horák
Modified: 2016-10-15 05:50 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: SuperLUMT-3.1.0-8.fc25 SuperLUMT-3.1.0-8.fc24 SuperLUMT-3.1.0-8.fc23
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-10-10 17:42:48 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Dan Horák 2016-10-05 16:28:18 UTC 
Currently sundials switched to require SuperLUMT, breaking the build on s390x due the lack of SuperLUMT there. But if I read the SuperLUMT README correctly, it's possible to use the bundled CBLAS if there no faster BLAS library available.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
SuperLUMT-3.1.0-7.fc26
Comment 1 Antonio T. (sagitter) 2016-10-05 19:39:34 UTC 
Hi Dan.

Do you prefer bundled CBLAS than 'blas' (http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=414810) ?
Comment 2 Dan Horák 2016-10-05 19:48:00 UTC 
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #1)
> Hi Dan.
> 
> Do you prefer bundled CBLAS than 'blas'
> (http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=414810) ?

I guess I should prefer blas from the lapack package over CBLAS :-) Please pick whatever you think is better.
Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2016-10-06 20:58:57 UTC 
SuperLUMT-3.1.0-8.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-c2f2523612
Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2016-10-07 09:25:24 UTC 
SuperLUMT-3.1.0-8.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-ffafdf7665
Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2016-10-07 09:58:51 UTC 
SuperLUMT-3.1.0-8.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-87dd3e82b3
Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2016-10-10 17:42:48 UTC 
SuperLUMT-3.1.0-8.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2016-10-15 02:50:24 UTC 
SuperLUMT-3.1.0-8.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2016-10-15 05:50:40 UTC 
SuperLUMT-3.1.0-8.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.