Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at
Bug 1384012 - lcgdm-1.9.0-2.fc26 FTBFS: error "This file is obsolete; please update your software."
Summary: lcgdm-1.9.0-2.fc26 FTBFS: error "This file is obsolete; please update your so...
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: lcgdm
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ricardo Rocha
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
Blocks: 1383740
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2016-10-12 11:19 UTC by Jitka Plesnikova
Modified: 2017-02-17 07:36 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: lcgdm-1.9.0-4.fc26
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2017-02-17 07:36:01 UTC
Type: Bug

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jitka Plesnikova 2016-10-12 11:19:47 UTC
Description of problem:
Package lcgdm fails to build from source in Fedora Rawhide.

/usr/include/openssl/asn1_mac.h:10:2: error: #error "This file is obsolete; please update your software."

/usr/include/voms/acstack.h:59:27: error: storage class specified for parameter 'sk_AC_TARGET_new'

../h/Csec_plugin.h:21:15: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'Csec_plugin_funcptrs_t'

Csec_plugin_GSS.c:150:16: error: 'activate_lock' undeclared (first use in this function)

Csec_plugin_GSS.c:1061:13: error: static declaration of '_Csec_process_gssapi_err' follows non-static declaration

This is probably caused by upgrading openssl from 1:1.0.2j-1.fc26 to 1:1.1.0b-1.fc26.

Additional info:
This package is tracked by Koschei. See:

Comment 1 Andrea 2016-10-12 12:22:42 UTC
Hello Jitka,
what we have in Rawhide now is going to be the last version of this software ( which is going to be replaced). So we won't release it in F26.
We would perfer not to make effort to port this to openssl 1.1.0, but we would like to understand what are the consequences. The package will be retired if we don't make the changes? only from Rawhide or also from the other branches?

Comment 2 Jitka Plesnikova 2016-10-26 11:16:25 UTC
If you want to replace the package in Rawhide, so it should be retired only in Rawhide. Other branches are working properly.

Comment 3 Mattias Ellert 2017-02-17 06:49:05 UTC
The bug reported here was not really a bug in lcgdm. The problem was that one of the package's dependencies (voms) had not yet been ported to openssl 1.1 at the time. This has been fixed since some time now.

The mass rebuild for lcgdm failed - but for a different reason. The build during the mass rebuild tried to use an older version of CGSI-gSOAP that had not been rebuilt for the new gsoap version.

A new rebuild that picks up the CGSI-gSOAP version that was built during the mass rebuild would succeed.

Here is a scratch build of the package without any changes added:

So if the maintainers could just retry the latest build without changes it would be OK.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.