Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1388787 (CVE-2016-6911) - CVE-2016-6911 gd, php: Missing check for OOB read in dynamicGetbuf()
Summary: CVE-2016-6911 gd, php: Missing check for OOB read in dynamicGetbuf()
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: CVE-2016-6911
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Red Hat Product Security
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1388788 1388790
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-10-26 08:11 UTC by Adam Mariš
Modified: 2019-09-29 13:58 UTC (History)
19 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
A vulnerability was found in gd. The function dynamicGetbuf() failed to check for out of bounds reads. An attacker could create a crafted image that would lead to a crash or, potentially, information disclosure.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-12-16 04:30:55 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
CVE-2016-6911 patch (deleted)
2016-10-26 08:17 UTC, Adam Mariš 		no flags Details | Diff
View All

Description Adam Mariš 2016-10-26 08:11:09 UTC 
It was found that dynamicGetbuf() doesn't check for out-of-bounds read and returns wrong return code.
Comment 1 Adam Mariš 2016-10-26 08:11:56 UTC 
Created gd tracking bugs for this issue:

Affects: fedora-all [bug 1388788]
Comment 2 Adam Mariš 2016-10-26 08:12:07 UTC 
Created php tracking bugs for this issue:

Affects: fedora-all [bug 1388790]
Comment 3 Adam Mariš 2016-10-26 08:17:42 UTC 
Created attachment 1214203 [details]
CVE-2016-6911 patch
Comment 4 Marek Skalický 2016-12-05 09:52:31 UTC 
Why the patch is not published to upstream?
Who created the fix please?
Comment 5 Adam Mariš 2016-12-05 10:42:32 UTC 
(In reply to Marek Skalický from comment #4)
> Why the patch is not published to upstream?
> Who created the fix please?

I took it from https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005274#c0
Comment 6 Marek Skalický 2016-12-06 11:21:05 UTC 
Pull request to upstream
https://github.com/libgd/libgd/pull/353
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.