Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1394517 - Many F24 texlive packages are considered newer than F25 packages
Summary: Many F24 texlive packages are considered newer than F25 packages
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: texlive
Version: 25
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tom "spot" Callaway
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-11-12 23:22 UTC by Göran Uddeborg
Modified: 2016-12-05 21:44 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: texlive-2016-22.20160520.fc25
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-12-05 21:44:17 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Göran Uddeborg 2016-11-12 23:22:43 UTC 
Description of problem:
I tried to upgrade texlive from the F24 version to F25.  After the upgrade, I realised a lot of the packages still remained in their F24 versions.  After some investigation, I realised that the EVR of (at least some of) these packages were higher in F24 than in F25.  This violates the versioning guidelines (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Versioning) I believe.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
texlive-2015-24.20150728_r37987.fc24
texlive-2016-17.20160520.fc25

How reproducible:
Every time

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Enable F25 repositories on an F24 
2. dnf upgrade texlive\*

Actual results:
Some of the texlive packages still remained in F24 version.

Expected results:
All texlive packages upgraded.

Additional info:
To give an example, texlive-concrete has EVR 5:svn15878.0-24.fc24.1 in F24 and 5:svn15878.0-17.fc25.1 in F25.
Comment 1 Tom "spot" Callaway 2016-11-14 15:28:15 UTC 
I knew there was a reason we bump epoch. Bumping it and rebuilding.
Comment 2 Fedora Update System 2016-11-15 15:10:18 UTC 
texlive-2016-18.20160520.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-2fd26db27f
Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2016-11-21 21:10:23 UTC 
texlive-2016-18.20160520.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-2fd26db27f
Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2016-11-22 13:24:58 UTC 
texlive-2016-19.20160520.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0d29e349a3
Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2016-12-01 18:55:43 UTC 
texlive-2016-22.20160520.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-871210a6e2
Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2016-12-04 08:07:43 UTC 
texlive-2016-22.20160520.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-871210a6e2
Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2016-12-05 21:44:17 UTC 
texlive-2016-22.20160520.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.