Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at
Bug 1416173 - Crash in
Summary: Crash in
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1415137
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: nss-softokn
Version: 25
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kai Engert (:kaie) (inactive account)
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2017-01-24 18:48 UTC by Piergiorgio Sartor
Modified: 2017-01-29 15:11 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2017-01-29 15:11:43 UTC
Type: Bug

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Piergiorgio Sartor 2017-01-24 18:48:22 UTC
Description of problem:
I'm seeing a strange crash in a Java software. It reports in happened in, which belongs to nss-softokn-freebl which, I assume, belongs to nss-softokn.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:
It seems systematically happening after upgrade to 3.28.1, while it never happened with 3.27.0 (so, there should be a difference there).

Steps to Reproduce:
Start software with nss-softokn-freebl-3.28.1

Actual results:
It crashes after few seconds, try to restart, crashes again until it gives up with:

# A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#  SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x00007fbbc3d9d77b, pid=959, tid=0x00007fbbc3073700
# JRE version: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (8.0_111-b16) (build 1.8.0_111-b16)
# Java VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (25.111-b16 mixed mode linux-amd64 compressed oops)
# Problematic frame:
# C  []

Expected results:
Should run smoothly, as before.

Additional info:
As mentioned above, version 3.27.0 was fine, 3.28.1 has this problem.

If there is anything to test I might give it a try (please tell me how to safely revert, in case).




Comment 1 Piergiorgio Sartor 2017-01-29 15:11:43 UTC
Uhm, this seems somehow duplicate of #1415137, maybe it can be marked accordingly.



*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1415137 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.