Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1424857 - flatpak-builder should depend on bzip2
Summary: flatpak-builder should depend on bzip2
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: flatpak
Version: 25
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David King
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-02-19 22:20 UTC by Guy Taylor
Modified: 2017-03-01 01:20 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: flatpak-0.8.3-3.fc26 flatpak-0.8.3-3.fc25 flatpak-0.8.3-3.fc24
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1422064
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-02-24 22:50:05 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Require bzip2 for flatpak-builder (663 bytes, patch)
2017-02-19 22:34 UTC, Guy Taylor 		no flags Details | Diff
View All

Description Guy Taylor 2017-02-19 22:20:26 UTC 
As it is common for archive packages to be compressed with bzip2 (tar.bz2) the flatpak-builder RPM package should depend on bzip2. This would help prevent painful debugging of build errors and make it "Just Work"™ in more situations.

Example affected build spec: https://github.com/KDE/flatpak-kde-applications/blob/c7b34f2d19cf4a951fda7d1900094ccfdff050b8/org.kde.krita.json#L32
Comment 1 Guy Taylor 2017-02-19 22:34:15 UTC 
Created attachment 1255554 [details]
Require bzip2 for flatpak-builder

I am new to RPMs coming from the DEB world but I believe this would solve the issue.

Note: flatpak-builder does not call "bzip2" itself bit uses "tar -j".
Comment 2 David King 2017-02-19 23:12:17 UTC 
Thanks for the patch. I had already prepared a patch which was a bit more complete (bumping the release number and adding a changelog entry) but the Requires change was sound. The Rawhide build is done, and builds for stable releases will follow soon.
Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2017-02-20 07:39:45 UTC 
flatpak-0.8.3-3.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-87896dfb59
Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2017-02-20 07:41:28 UTC 
flatpak-0.8.3-3.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-bc7abf175b
Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2017-02-20 20:23:29 UTC 
flatpak-0.8.3-3.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-bc7abf175b
Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2017-02-20 21:22:29 UTC 
flatpak-0.8.3-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-87896dfb59
Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2017-02-24 22:50:05 UTC 
flatpak-0.8.3-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2017-03-01 01:20:23 UTC 
flatpak-0.8.3-3.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.