Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1548687 - llvm: Partial injection of Fedora build flags
Summary: llvm: Partial injection of Fedora build flags
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: llvm
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tom Stellard
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: Fedora28BuildFlags
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-02-24 12:02 UTC by Florian Weimer
Modified: 2018-04-05 14:39 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-04-05 14:39:33 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Florian Weimer 2018-02-24 12:02:54 UTC 
/usr/lib64/libLLVM-6.0.so and /usr/lib64/libLTO.so.6.0.0 in llvm-libs-6.0.0-0.3.rc1.fc28.x86_64 have not been linked with the standard Fedora linker flags (LDFLAGS) from redhat-rpm-config.

In particular, the BIND_NOW feature is missing, as can be seen from the readelf -d output:

 0x000000006ffffffb (FLAGS_1)            Flags: NODELETE

There should be a NOW flag.

See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/blob/master/f/buildflags.md for information on RPM macros and environment variables provided by the build environment.
Comment 1 Tom Stellard 2018-03-22 23:59:11 UTC 
This was fixed in rawhide by llvm-6.0.0-5.fc29.
Comment 2 Igor Gnatenko 2018-03-26 08:43:55 UTC 
(In reply to Tom Stellard from comment #1)
> This was fixed in rawhide by llvm-6.0.0-5.fc29.

Can you get fix into F28 as well?
Comment 3 Tom Stellard 2018-03-26 14:40:14 UTC 
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #2)
> (In reply to Tom Stellard from comment #1)
> > This was fixed in rawhide by llvm-6.0.0-5.fc29.
> 
> Can you get fix into F28 as well?

Yes, I working on it.
Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2018-04-02 14:22:02 UTC 
pocl-1.1-2.fc28 lldb-6.0.0-3.fc28 clang-6.0.0-5.fc28 llvm-6.0.0-11.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-02c4091319
Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2018-04-03 15:57:29 UTC 
clang-6.0.0-5.fc28, lldb-6.0.0-3.fc28, llvm-6.0.0-11.fc28, mesa-18.0.0-2.fc28.1, pocl-1.1-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-02c4091319
Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2018-04-03 23:25:53 UTC 
clang-6.0.0-5.fc28 lldb-6.0.0-3.fc28 llvm-6.0.0-11.fc28 mesa-18.0.0-3.fc28 pocl-1.1-2.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-02c4091319
Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2018-04-04 18:35:28 UTC 
clang-6.0.0-5.fc28, lldb-6.0.0-3.fc28, llvm-6.0.0-11.fc28, mesa-18.0.0-3.fc28, pocl-1.1-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-02c4091319
Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2018-04-05 11:48:07 UTC 
clang-6.0.0-5.fc28, lldb-6.0.0-3.fc28, llvm-6.0.0-11.fc28, mesa-18.0.0-3.fc28, pocl-1.1-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.