Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at
Bug 1604081 - ghc-conduit-combinators: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide
Summary: ghc-conduit-combinators: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: ghc-conduit-combinators
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David Shea
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
Blocks: F29FTBFS
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2018-07-19 20:57 UTC by Mohan Boddu
Modified: 2018-07-23 10:53 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2018-07-23 10:53:37 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
build.log (1.17 KB, text/plain)
2018-07-19 20:57 UTC, Mohan Boddu
no flags Details
root.log (32.00 KB, text/plain)
2018-07-19 20:57 UTC, Mohan Boddu
no flags Details
state.log (501 bytes, text/plain)
2018-07-19 20:57 UTC, Mohan Boddu
no flags Details

Description Mohan Boddu 2018-07-19 20:57:23 UTC
ghc-conduit-combinators failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide

For details on the mass rebuild see:
Please fix ghc-conduit-combinators at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to
ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks,
ghc-conduit-combinators will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 30,
ghc-conduit-combinators will be retired, if it still fails to build.

For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit:

Comment 1 Mohan Boddu 2018-07-19 20:57:28 UTC
Created attachment 1462177 [details]

Comment 2 Mohan Boddu 2018-07-19 20:57:30 UTC
Created attachment 1462178 [details]

file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes

Comment 3 Mohan Boddu 2018-07-19 20:57:32 UTC
Created attachment 1462179 [details]

Comment 4 David Shea 2018-07-23 10:53:37 UTC
Huh, a lot going on here. The main part, though, is that it'd be great if you actually glanced at the results before saying the package build failed. The build in question didn't even actually build, since it was aborted due a problem in kojid:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/koji/", line 1244, in runTask
    response = (,)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/koji/", line 307, in run
    return koji.util.call_with_argcheck(self.handler, self.params, self.opts)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/koji/", line 209, in call_with_argcheck
    return func(*args, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/sbin/kojid", line 1225, in handler,arch)
  File "/usr/sbin/kojid", line 527, in build,self.getPackageList())
  File "/usr/sbin/kojid", line 557, in getPackageList
    for h in ts.dbMatch():
error: rpmdb open failed

Maybe there's a problem on the build machine? I don't know, and running the build again worked fine, so I also don't care.

Furthermore, it'd be great if you took a look at the Fedora vacation calendar before issuing ultimatums.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.