Updated specfile and source rpm:

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/knight-of-ni/specfiles/master/fcgiwrap.spec

https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1763/30651763/fcgiwrap-1.1.0-6.20150530git99c942c.fc30.src.rpm

Had to put back the --with-systemd configure flag, even though we are supplying our own systemd service files.

Converted the systemd unit files to instantiated service files. This allows one to run fcgiwrap under an arbitrary user account, which under normal circumstances will be the name of the web server user account in use on the system. 

To enable and start fcgiwrap on a system with nginx, do this:

$ systemctl enable fcgiwrap
$ systemctl start fcgiwrap


Updated specfiles and source rpm:

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/knight-of-ni/specfiles/master/fcgiwrap.spec

https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1241/30671241/fcgiwrap-1.1.0-6.20150530git99c942c.fc30.src.rpm

Here are the contents of the service files included with the package:

fcgiwrap@.service
------------------
[Unit]
Description=Simple CGI Server
After=nss-user-lookup.target

[Service]
EnvironmentFile=/etc/sysconfig/fcgiwrap
ExecStart=/usr/sbin/fcgiwrap ${DAEMON_OPTS} -c ${DAEMON_PROCS} 
User=%i
Group=%i

[Install]
Also=fcgiwrap@%i.socket

fcgiwrap@.socket
----------------
[Unit]
Description=fcgiwrap Socket

[Socket]
ListenStream=/run/fcgiwrap.sock
SocketUser=%i
SocketMode=0660

[Install]
WantedBy=sockets.target

 - Group: is not used in Fedora

 - date should be the date you took the snapshot, not the date of the commit

Package approved, fix the above issues before import.


Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
     BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". 7 files have unknown
     license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/bob/packaging/review/fcgiwrap/review-fcgiwrap/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: systemd_post is invoked in %post, systemd_preun in %preun, and
     systemd_postun in %postun for Systemd service files.
     Note: Systemd service file(s) in fcgiwrap
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
     fcgiwrap-debuginfo , fcgiwrap-debugsource
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
     justified.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
[x]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: fcgiwrap-1.1.0-6.20150530git99c942c.fc30.x86_64.rpm
          fcgiwrap-debuginfo-1.1.0-6.20150530git99c942c.fc30.x86_64.rpm
          fcgiwrap-debugsource-1.1.0-6.20150530git99c942c.fc30.x86_64.rpm
          fcgiwrap-1.1.0-6.20150530git99c942c.fc30.src.rpm
fcgiwrap.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cgiwrap -> wrapping
fcgiwrap.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fcgi -> GIF
fcgiwrap.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cgiwrap -> wrapping
fcgiwrap.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US systemd -> systems, system, system d
fcgiwrap.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fcgi -> GIF
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.

Done, and thanks!

New src rpm:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/691/30740691/fcgiwrap-1.1.0-7.20181108git99c942c.fc30.src.rpm

(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fcgiwrap

fcgiwrap-1.1.0-7.20181108git99c942c.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-ea5776974f

fcgiwrap-1.1.0-7.20181108git99c942c.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-da190af820

fcgiwrap-1.1.0-7.20181108git99c942c.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-da190af820

fcgiwrap-1.1.0-7.20181108git99c942c.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-ea5776974f

fcgiwrap-1.1.0-7.20181108git99c942c.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-19296d2898

fcgiwrap-1.1.0-7.20181108git99c942c.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b07b908607

fcgiwrap-1.1.0-7.20181108git99c942c.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-19296d2898

fcgiwrap-1.1.0-7.20181108git99c942c.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b07b908607

fcgiwrap-1.1.0-7.20181108git99c942c.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

fcgiwrap-1.1.0-7.20181108git99c942c.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

fcgiwrap-1.1.0-7.20181108git99c942c.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

fcgiwrap-1.1.0-7.20181108git99c942c.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.