Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at
Bug 165288 - Review Request: libgdamm
Summary: Review Request: libgdamm
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Michael Schwendt
QA Contact: David Lawrence
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2005-08-07 02:17 UTC by Tom "spot" Callaway
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2005-08-13 20:51:39 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Updated Spec file (deleted)
2005-08-11 15:55 UTC, Tom "spot" Callaway
no flags Details

Description Tom "spot" Callaway 2005-08-07 02:17:55 UTC
Spec Name or Url:

SRPM Name or Url:

Description: C++ wrappers for libgda. libgdamm is part of gnomemm - the C++
interface to the GTK+ GUI library.

This package was requested to help clear the path for glom. The spec is pretty typical for a gtk lib. 

Thanks in advance.

Comment 1 Michael Schwendt 2005-08-07 03:27:36 UTC
libgdamm-devel "Requires: glibmm24-devel" because of C++ header contents
and "Requires: libgda-devel" because of pkg-config file dependencies.

Generic INSTALL file in %doc is of no interest to package users.

README in %doc is 24 bytes and pretty much useless (unless you insist
on packaging it because it _may_ change in the future).

--enable-docs doesn't do anything.

Both package descriptions are confusing, IMHO. I don't think "libgdamm
is part of gnomemm" (=> libgnomemm26 in Extras). It is "part of a set of
powerful C++ bindings for the GNOME libraries, which provide additional 
functionality above GTK+/gtkmm".

In -devel summary and description I usually add the information that
"libraries" are included, too.

Comment 2 Tom "spot" Callaway 2005-08-11 15:55:58 UTC
Created attachment 117652 [details]
Updated Spec file

This updated spec makes the changes that you've pointed out. :)

Comment 3 Michael Schwendt 2005-08-11 16:47:21 UTC
Right. Approved.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.