Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 167406 - Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Fuzzy - Maketext from already interpolated strings
Summary: Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Fuzzy - Maketext from already interpolat...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tom "spot" Callaway
QA Contact: David Lawrence
URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-ACCEPT
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-09-02 13:19 UTC by Jose Pedro Oliveira
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-09-10 01:28:04 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jose Pedro Oliveira 2005-09-02 13:19:42 UTC
Spec Name or Url:
http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Locale-Maketext-Fuzzy.spec
SRPM Name or Url:
http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Locale-Maketext-Fuzzy-0.02-1.src.rpm

Description:
This module is a subclass of Locale::Maketext, with additional
support for localizing messages that already contains interpolated
variables.  This is most useful when the messages are returned by
external modules -- for example, to match "dir: command not foundr"
against "[_1]: command not found".

Note:
This package is an RT 3.4 requirement

Comment 1 Ralf Corsepius 2005-09-02 13:57:58 UTC
APPROVED.

Comment 2 Tom "spot" Callaway 2005-09-05 04:55:20 UTC
Kicking this back to FE-REVIEW, it is missing the license texts in %doc.

Comment 3 Jose Pedro Oliveira 2005-09-05 17:36:41 UTC
I have no plans of adding license files not include in the source tarball.

People installing only the binary RPMS won't be able to know if they were
added by the author or by a third party, and I don't want to induce someone
in error if I make mistakes (shipping incomplete license info, placing the
wrong license, ...).

So as of this moment I am also stopping updating/reviewing/approving packages.

Comment 4 Jose Pedro Oliveira 2005-09-09 11:02:59 UTC
CVS devel branch:
Added a comment about the license files location to the specfile.




Comment 5 Jose Pedro Oliveira 2005-09-10 00:38:52 UTC
Tom,

Can I consider this package and #167405 approved?

/jpo

Comment 6 Tom "spot" Callaway 2005-09-10 00:44:35 UTC
Yes.

Comment 7 Jose Pedro Oliveira 2005-09-10 01:28:04 UTC
Thanks.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.