Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1744725 - Lutris package ready for EPEL 8 need cabextract
Summary: Lutris package ready for EPEL 8 need cabextract
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: cabextract
Version: epel8
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Rex Dieter
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1745734
Blocks: 1913737
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-08-22 18:17 UTC by jatin
Modified: 2021-03-08 20:16 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version: cabextract-1.9-7.el8
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-03-08 20:16:22 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github jatin-cbs/Lutris-RHEL-CentOS-8 0 None None None 2020-09-02 19:11:26 UTC

Description jatin 2019-08-22 18:17:24 UTC 
I have the lutris package for RHEL 8 here ready 

https://github.com/jatin-cbs/Lutris-RHEL-CentOS-8

But currently we dont have cabextract in EPEL so we are using cabextract from fedora 28. Just once cabextract in ready in EPEL I will like to maintain lutris package on EPEL. :)
Comment 1 Kevin Fenzi 2019-08-22 18:22:15 UTC 
Can you please file your requests against the existing fedora packages? That allows the maintainer(s) to see your request and indicate to you if they want to maintain their package also in epel8. 

epel-release is just the package that provides the version and repo files, we have no special army of packages we can direct to help you. Sorry.
Comment 2 Morten Stevens 2019-08-26 18:54:30 UTC 
All right. But we need libmspack-devel as build-dependency to build cabextract.
Comment 3 Robert Scheck 2021-01-07 14:45:47 UTC 
Is there any specific reason why we finally don't go for cabextract 1.7 from Fedora 29 to get this solved? A simple rebuild seems to work...
Comment 4 Robert Scheck 2021-03-05 12:53:49 UTC 
Rex, may I kindly ask you to respond or to grant permissions to the epel8 branch?
Comment 5 Robert Scheck 2021-03-07 19:56:49 UTC 
FAS: robert
Comment 6 jatin 2021-03-07 23:13:09 UTC 
@
Comment 7 jatin 2021-03-07 23:15:58 UTC 
I have been maintaining the package alongside cabextract rpm also it has been accepted upstream https://github.com/lutris/website/commit/c1be4af47259c4d6161df606d830913bc2537cd3 

So EPEL is no longer needed but it may conflict with existing users if it will be in the EPEL so please do inform me on my github https://github.com/jatin-cbs/Lutris-RHEL-CentOS-8
Comment 8 jatin 2021-03-07 23:18:33 UTC 
I will remove the cabextract from my repository if its available in EPEL and also i will send pull request to the website.
Comment 9 Robert Scheck 2021-03-07 23:42:53 UTC 
I need cabextract for the playonlinux package in EPEL 8, reopening.
Comment 10 Rex Dieter 2021-03-08 00:17:10 UTC 
I can work on this today (and gave commit access to you robert)
Comment 11 Raphael Groner 2021-03-08 06:28:32 UTC 
+1
Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2021-03-08 15:10:50 UTC 
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-6d33b87c36 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-6d33b87c36
Comment 13 Robert Scheck 2021-03-08 15:13:21 UTC 
Rex, thank you for building cabextract-1.9-7.el8 :)
Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2021-03-08 20:16:22 UTC 
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-6d33b87c36 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.