Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at
Bug 178604 - Review Request: ruby-mysql
Summary: Review Request: ruby-mysql
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Mike McGrath
QA Contact: David Lawrence
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2006-01-22 11:53 UTC by Oliver Andrich
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2006-02-04 22:41:22 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Oliver Andrich 2006-01-22 11:53:46 UTC
Spec Name or Url:
SRPM Name or Url:
A Ruby interface to MySQL

This is the MySQL API module for Ruby. It provides the same functions for
Ruby programs that the MySQL C API provides for C programs.

Comment 1 Mike McGrath 2006-01-22 18:10:48 UTC
Couple of things

-Duplicate build requires: 
     openssl-devel is provided by mysql-devel
     zlib-devel is provided by openssl-devel
-Should clean the build root in %install (add rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)

Comment 2 Oliver Andrich 2006-01-22 18:39:57 UTC
Fixed these things.

Spec Name or Url:
SRPM Name or Url:

Comment 3 Mike McGrath 2006-01-26 22:56:39 UTC
-Fix the changelog (you'll have to make a 2.7-4)
-I'd package this in the Development/Languages group (php-mysql is)
-use "make %{?_smp_mflags}" under %build

rpmlint output:
W: ruby-mysql incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.7-1 2.7-3

non-blocker: I think removing the summary from %description might clean it up a bit.

Comment 4 Oliver Andrich 2006-01-27 18:14:44 UTC
Fixed the above mentioned things.

Spec Name or Url:
SRPM Name or Url:

Comment 5 Mike McGrath 2006-02-03 20:17:30 UTC
One small thing.  I'd release this under the GPL license.  In the copying file
it says the following:

Ruby is copyrighted free software by Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz>.
You can redistribute it and/or modify it under either the terms of the GPL
(see the file GPL), or the conditions below.  

I'd just change the License to GPL since more people are familiar with it.

Comment 6 Oliver Andrich 2006-02-03 20:54:09 UTC
Spec Name or Url:
SRPM Name or Url:

As just discussed in #fedora-extras I switched to GPL as the licence, cause this
is what the Packaging Guidelines tell in case of dual licensed software. I also
included the license files.

Comment 7 Mike McGrath 2006-02-03 21:12:49 UTC
Found something else, this package creates
/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/i386-linux/  Because it doesn't own those
directories it leaves /usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/i386-linux/ when you remove the
package.  Also aren't most ruby libraries located in /usr/lib/ruby/?

Comment 8 Oliver Andrich 2006-02-03 21:34:22 UTC
Yes, this intended behaviour, cause /usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/i386-linux/ is owned
by the ruby-libs package. This package is required anyway, cause my package
requires which is provided by the package ruby-libs. So I think,
I don'T need to explicitly require ruby-libs.

Comment 9 Mike McGrath 2006-02-03 21:59:34 UTC
Got'cha.  No problem there then:

-rpmlint: No output
-Meets Naming Guidelines
-%{name}.spec matches
-License is GPL and a COPYING file is included stating that fact
-SPEC is written in english
-SPEC file is easy to follow
-Source matches Upstream
-Compiles successfully in Mock
-Only required build requres listed
-No duplicate build requires
-locales unused (not needed)
-included libraries are not located in dynamic linker's default paths
-No duplicate files
-Owns all directories it creates: doesn't actually create any dirs
-does not have any devel packages (does not need them)


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.